Secondary to you Lloyd but primary to me or just as important. I have put the same shaft in different heads and ball flight was altered. To me (but I may be wrong) frequency is not an end in itself especially if you only measure butt frequency. Frequency is also affected by weight so at this point I am in favour of deflection rather than frequency. And since 90% of the golfing population hit the fade side of the target I am strongly in favour of closed face clubheads.If your customers select the right frequency for them and end up with a straight face or open face club you've only solved 1/2 the equation. Andre
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lloyd Hackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <ShopTalk@mail.msen.com> > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 10:05 AM > Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Looking for an Alternate > > > > Andre > > > > I do not disagree that ball flight is a function of the head ( secondary ) > > but I feel you get your best distance and an improvement in accuracy from > > using the proper shaft frequency. I see it every day, our test clubs do > > not > > have the same heads that we sell or are in the customers clubs but when > > the > > customer hits the proper shaft first in the test club and then in his club > > head or a selected new head he gets the extra distance and better > > accuracy. > > We reshaft a lot of off the shelf clubs and improve distance and accuracy > > for the player by only changing the shaft frequency. > > > > llhack > >
