On 6/8/07, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:02:41AM -0400, Will Murnane wrote: > > > > That doesn't make NAT necessary or good. It's simply that in most > > cases there aren't enough IPs to go around. If there were, NAT would > > be (IMO) useless. > > > That is, unless your intent is to make it (virtually) impossible to > address your host(s) globally. Name a case in which firewalling does not suffice. I'm curious to see what your answer will be.
Will ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
