On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:10 -0700, Christ Schlacta wrote: > I think my largest issue with it is that I'm not sure I understand how > all the pieces fit together, so I'm hesitant to dive in. > for example: the config gets compiled on one system, but applied on > another system. the systems may or may not have the same interfaces, > and may or may not have the same routes, etc.
So? The compiler doesn't look at the current system's configuration other than to determine it's capabilities. When compiling for export, a capabilities file is used (one is generated automatically by the 'load' and 'reload' commands if it doesn't exist). > Combine that with the use of a make file, and I just don't see how > it all fits together. :-S Use of the make file is entirely optional. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
