Hi All,

Thank you Sunny for the impact assessment. Re your questions/comments, I will 
address them inline:

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025, at 19:46, Sunny Chendi wrote:
> 
> Questions/Comments:
>  • To date, the Secretariat has not received any reports of Whois data abuse 
> relating to organizations that have signed the AUP to access bulk data. 
> According to our records, Hurricane Electric and RecordedFuture do not have 
> access to APNIC bulk Whois data.

In my problem statement I noted that both Hurricane Electric and RecordedFuture 
republish APNIC Whois data online. They are not the only organisations. Here's 
a set of four screenshots of APNIC Whois information republished online that 
includes the address, email, and telephone information that is the subject of 
this policy proposal:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zz24j27hna8pyppfnypco/Screenshot-2025-02-10-at-1.50.09-PM.png?rlkey=yrze4cb9guwnqbay0d5qpijnp&dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/vovhkw8a0ovqkvabwpgdv/Screenshot-2025-02-10-at-1.51.05-PM.png?rlkey=k5yfug3nn0kw3u0t9glibebdy&dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/dhnunuq9la8ybfw8xdkef/Screenshot-2025-02-10-at-1.51.49-PM.png?rlkey=l33gzhfhqe1lrdszx6imp6pw5&dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/7in3u9jizz4q11s7ru754/Screenshot-2025-02-10-at-1.56.16-PM.png?rlkey=2morewx3adh76ooybr3a23zp6&dl=0

It could be that these sites all draw information from the APNIC WHOIS Database 
query service. prop-162-v002 addresses this possibility.

>  • Over 400 organizations now have access to bulk Whois data. Around 70 
> unique logins have accessed bulk Whois data over the last 3 months. 

Is a list of organisations with bulk access available to APNIC members? If so 
I'd appreciate a link.

>  • The current Whois data acceptable use agreement (AUA) does not contemplate 
> the revocation of access by the Secretariat. However, the Secretariat can 
> implement stronger terms and require accession to them for continued access 
> to the bulk Whois data. This would not address prior issues but may help 
> limit the impact going forward.

Noted.

>  • The existing AUA does not contemplate a requirement to delete prior data 
> without evidence of misuse. As noted above with respect to access, APNIC can 
> remove ongoing access until such time as the re-publisher accedes to new 
> terms.

Noted.

> Implementation:
> 
> This proposal may require changes to APNIC systems, internal policy, 
> procedures, and agreements. If this proposal reaches consensus, 
> implementation may be completed within three (3) months.

Noted.


> 
> Regards,
> Sunny
> APNIC Secretariat

Thank you again.

Regards,

Jon

> 
> On 13/01/2025 2:02 pm, Bertrand Cherrier via SIG-policy wrote:
>> Dear SIG members,
>> 
>> A new proposal "prop-162-v001: WHOIS Privacy" has been sent to the Policy 
>> SIG for review.
>> 
>> It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting (OPM) at APNIC 59 on 
>> Wednesday, 26 February 2025.
>> 
>>     https://conference.apnic.net/59/programme/programme/index.html#/day/8/
>> 
>> We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list 
>> before the OPM.
>> 
>> The comment period on the mailing list before the OPM is an important part 
>> of the Policy Development Process (PDP). We encourage you to express your 
>> views on the proposal:
>> 
>>   - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
>>   - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
>>     tell the community about your situation.
>>   - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>>   - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>>   - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
>> 
>> Information about this proposal is appended below as well as available at:
>> 
>>     http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-162
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Bertrand, Shaila, and Ching-Heng
>> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> prop-162-v001: WHOIS Privacy
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Proposer:
>> Jonathan Brewer ([email protected])
>> 
>> 
>> 1. Problem statement
>> -------------------------
>> Through permitted bulk access to APNIC whois, several organisations 
>> including Hurricane Electric and RecordedFuture republish physical 
>> addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers of APNIC members.  
>> 
>> These details are freely available on the web and available for mass 
>> harvesting through the use of screen scraping technology. It is apparent 
>> that some third parties have used this data in a manner contrary to the 
>> APNIC whois data acceptable use agreement.
>> 
>> In the past three years organisations including the Number Resource Society 
>> (Casablanca, Morocco), Unique IP Solutions (Faisalabad, Pakistan), Aileron 
>> IT (Wisconsin,  USA), and EarnheardData (details suppressed) have contacted 
>> my organisation via details published exclusively in APNIC whois. None of 
>> these contacts have been to do with a legitimate networking issue.
>> 
>> 2. Objective of policy change
>> ----------------------------------
>> This policy will eliminate the unnecessary publication of APNIC member 
>> organisation contact details. People with a legitimate need for these 
>> contact details can use a service directly provided by APNIC to obtain them.
>> 
>> 3. Situation in other regions
>> --------------------------------
>> Unknown
>> 
>> 4. Proposed policy solution
>> --------------------------------
>> APNIC should remove all email addresses, telephone numbers, and physical 
>> addresses from any bulk WHOIS data, and should cause any existing 
>> re-publishers of APNIC WHOIS data to remove this information from the 
>> Internet as a condition for continued access to data.
>> 
>> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages
>> ------------------------------------
>> Advantages:
>> This should reduce future marketing calls to the NOC phone and marketing 
>> emails to the noc email address.
>> 
>> Disadvantages:
>> None. The information will still be available via APNIC-controlled WHOIS 
>> services which presumably are protected against illegitimate data harvesting.
>> 
>> 6. Impact on resource holders
>> -----------------------------------
>> No impact on resource holders.
>> 
>> 7. References
>> ----------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> 
> -- 
> 
> I am sending this email at a time that suits me and the time zone I work in. 
> Please feel free to read, and act on or respond, at a time that suits you.
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> 
> Srinivas (Sunny) Chendi (he/him)
> Senior Regional Advisor - Membership and Policy 
> 
> Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) |  Tel: +61 7 3858 3100
> PO Box 3646 South Brisbane, QLD 4101 Australia  |  Fax: +61 7 3858 3199
> 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD          |  http://www.apnic.net
> _______________________________________________________________________
> 
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
> copies of the original message.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

https://jon.brewer.nz/
_______________________________________________
SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to