On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Badri Natarajan <asi...@vsnl.com> wrote: > > How is my question ad hominem? You made an unsupported assertion and I
Unsupported assertion? In the 26/11 case? I never said Kasab should not get a lawyer or get a fair trial or that perjury was committed in the 26/11 case. Before quoting me out of context can you explain how you concluded or assumed that my statement on perjury was referring to the 26/11 case in particular? > asked if you had any evidence to support it, because it doesn't jibe with > my experience. Not because I think Indian courts are better than American One, everyone does not have the same experiences and as a lawyer if you have not experienced it in an Indian court, your client is lucky. Two, why should i cite un-related personal cases on an archived list? > As for me, I am an Advocate and I have practised law in India, California > (briefly) and now England, so yes, you could say that I have "interacted" > with the Indian legal system. nice to know that :) -- .
