On 09-Oct-09, at 10:22 PM, Thaths wrote:
[snip]
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Manar Hussain <ma...@ivision.co.uk>
wrote:
At the risk of being divisive, not with this para but with some
others' comments, I think simply saying the prize should be for good
deeds already done, it's a sham, political etc. risks being dogmatic
and perhaps naive. .
You mean good deeds already done like Kissinger's (Laureate in '73)
Your message should have ended this discussion. Kissinger's win was
the precise moment of the Peace Prize's descent into farce, and it is
mind-boggling that people still treat it somewhat seriously.
-Taj.
