On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:53:10PM +0100, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote: > > ...and you're wrong about carrier-grade NAT ;p > > That depends what you think my opinion on it is... since that blog post, > everyone seems to think I'm all for it! I see it as a sad inevitability
Count me in among all these mistaken souls. > that I'd like to work around, as IPv6 deployment still seems a serious > uphill struggle... > > ...so, if you think I'm wrong, are you a fan of carrier-grade NAT, then? ;-) It blows chunks, of course. I kept and keep bugging people about IPv6 support. It is coming, but far slower than I like.
