Hmm,

Nice article. I've been guilty of shooting beyond 40 hours a week
easily despite efforts to curb it.

I think it boils down to these also most of the times (may be limited
to my limited experience of working in only software companies):

1. Working on something where you are a pro in terms of skills. Lesser
the pro you are, you have to spend time reading up on many stuff and
mastering the stuff that you counter in your daily work before
implementing and executing those stuff.

2. Culture and such. Depends on the environment in your company or
work place. Sometimes you need support from others to finish tasks
asap. Any laxness on others part (for eg: late reviews, late
discussions etc) makes it only tougher for you etc.

I wonder if there are any Startup guys and Code coolies on this list.
Usually, these are the folks whose work hours extends past 40 hour
limit from what I've observed. Anyone from this category wanna share
your experiences on this and prove me wrong ?

Regards,
- Bharat | https://twitter.com/cerebraltangent



On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<sur...@hserus.net> wrote:
> Physically well rounded - certainly
>
> --
> srs (blackberry)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Udhay Shankar N <ud...@pobox.com>
> Sender: silklist-bounces+suresh=hserus....@lists.hserus.net
> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:34:26
> To: <silklist@lists.hserus.net>
> Reply-To: silklist@lists.hserus.net
> Subject: Re: [silk] Anyone who works 40-hour weeks?
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Srini RamaKrishnan <che...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I see pillars of individual identity like a stool with legs. The more legs
>> you have, the more stable the stool is. If you invest all your identity into
>> only one pillar, then what happens when it breaks away is the stool loses
>> balance.
>
> I concur, but of course you knew that, as this is one of the topics
> that has recurred many many times over the course of many many beers
> over the years. :)
>
> IOW, a well rounded personality is a (physically and psychologically)
> healthy one. There is a reason why cliches become cliches...
>
> I wonder what Thaths has to add to this.
>
> Udhay
> --
> ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
>

Reply via email to