The common denominator is "truth in advertising"
Safety is always relative to threat and a matter of informed choice.
If YOU were in charge of safety, a doctor would make a much better advisor,
no longer stuffed into a self defense box.
You see "Stossel" this week?
Ode
At 07:39 AM 3/1/2010 -0800, you wrote:
Ode,
I must disagree. The FDA should be in charge of safety, not
efficacy. Thus, so long as something isn't going to poison or kill you,
it should be available regardless of whether or not it works. Truth in
advertising is another issue entirely and should not be subjected to FDA
approval. There is far too much power within the FDA and it is causing
us our basic freedoms. They will soon try and make Vit. C a prescription
drug (as well as hundreds of other harmless supplements and nutrients)
even though no one has ever died from it. I'll take the risk AND my
freedom to choose how I want to medicate if at all as opposed to having
my choices suppressed entirely.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ode Coyote" <odecoy...@windstream.net>
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: CS>(LL) Have you heard of this name change ?? Sweeteners.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>
