Well I suppose if we all thought like that, then we wouldn't bother to make CS either! There wouldn't be any point, because we could just go and take the anti-biotics the doctor gives us as they may or may not, kill us, but hey - who cares - we are going to die of something anyway! dee
On 28 Feb 2010, at 15:05, Ode Coyote wrote: > > > So how many benefited from Vioxx that may have died without it, compared to > those that died with it? [I dunno, but that's not the point] > Absolutism is just not part of reality...there is never just one answer. [But > it does make self defense very expensive for a drug company when lawyers > prosecute on absolutist terms using absolutist juries ] > The doctor is required to inform of risks...to the best of his knowledge. > Nothing is free of risk. It's ALL "Relative risk vs probable benefit " > > A doubled risk of heart attack, stroke and death persisted at least a year > after people stopped taking withdrawn painkiller Vioxx ..which means "what? > Double WHAT risk? > Does that mean 1 in 10,000 turns into 2 in 10,000 ? > -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org Unsubscribe: <mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>
