How do you reverse the direction of current flow?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ode Coyote" <odecoy...@windstream.net>
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Zapper
Reverse the direction of current flow...switch the positive to negative
and negative to positive.
..to go bi polar...electrical mood swing
Ode
At 07:01 AM 5/4/2010 -0500, you wrote:
I hate to be reallly green about this, what does it mean to switch the
polarity? Thanks, Kathy
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ode Coyote" <odecoy...@windstream.net>
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Zapper
It only cancels out what is left in the surface where blood flow is
slow...which is also why it's painful.
With 15 minute cycles, or even 5 minute cycles, you've given it time for
most of the chemicals to enter the blood stream before being canceled by
the switch.
The cancellation effect wouldn't be instant, but it would be pretty
fast, so some small amount of time spend doing that would detract from
the amount of time stuff of one sort or the other is entering the blood
stream..and..building up in the skin...so the faster the cycle the more
that factor takes out of the cycle doing nothing to change the
blood....but keeps the skin neutral.
Ode
At 10:33 AM 5/3/2010 -0400, you wrote:
Hi Mary Ann,
It has been advised on the Microelectricitygermkiller group to switch
polarity at five minute intervals to avoid the possibility of pain which
can develop in the fingers if this is not done. Apparently, someone who
was not switching polarity ended up with fairly severe pain after
ignoring the advice.
If polarity switching effectively cancels out any effectiveness of using
the Zilla why then do people get huge herxes and why do reports of
condition improvements exist? Pacebo effect is something I can accept as
a possible partial explanation for improvements but for herxing??
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:marmar...@bellsouth.net>MaryAnn Helland
To: <mailto:silver-list@eskimo.com>silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Zapper
OK -- here's another message I found from last Wednesday.
If you're right, and switching polarity negates the use of the unit in
the first place -- then what's the point of it all? Would one,
instead, simply use one polarity as long as tolerable?
MA
From: Ode Coyote
<mailto:odecoy...@windstream.net>odecoy...@windstream.net
Yea, that's the basic idea.
>
>
At 05:44 AM 4/27/2010 -0700, you wrote:
>Ode -- are you saying that by switching polarity, you're
undoing >whatever
>good you're doing by using the unit in the first place?
>MA (confused)
>
>
>From: Ode Coyote
<mailto:odecoy...@windstream.net><mailto:odecoy...@windstream.net>odecoy...@windstream.net
>
>
>PS Switching polarity inputs the opposing electrochemical,
> >neutralizing
>what you were trying to do at that spot.
>
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>
