Robert Toborek <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi Mike, > >Thank for your quick answer! I would imagine one forum with some complexity >scale to the topics would be okay. Single forum may encourage some >knowledgeable oldtimers to contribute and help in answering the basic >newbie questions without overwhelming any single person.
That is a very astute answer. I think the complexity issue can be addressed by learning who are the members of the forum. The oldtimers will quickly become well known by their ability to answer the way a newcomer needs it to be expressed. I find the same issue when I am trying to understand some particularly difficult issue in electronics, or a troubling circuit analysis in LTspice. I can read the same descriptions that everyone gives, for example in google, and it just doesn't sink in. But I can find something written by an obscure author who just happens to word things in just a way that finally unlocks the knots and now everything makes sense. I'm sure the same thing will happen in the SilverCell forum. We need everyone we can find to understand the SilverCell process and explain it to others. This will take time, but this is something we have plenty of. >Some people learn >faster than others and, at one point, would need to jump the >forum advancement BARRIER. And let's face it, most newbies, like myself, >would probably join both forums anyway. LOL! That is the best answer I have seen. Why split the forums when the people that I need to reach the most will join both? Thanks. That is the answer I needed. >I've seen it done before, where people of all experience levels contribute, >teach, and correct one another; argue sometimes, but those arguments >usually lead to elimination of potential misconceptions and all is well at >the end. A lot of the arguments that occurred in cs were because no one understood the process. I have solved that problem, and I think the things that still remain are the most important. How do the silver ions act in the immune system to counter pathogens, and what can we do to assist the process? Other questions abound about the entire relation of pathogens to humans. What can we do to interfere with the goal of the pathogen and deflect or destroy it, eliminate it from our life path, and prevent it from entering in the first place? Let's face the issue. You have a pathogen that if you allow it, will cause you great harm or kill you. This does not lend itself to diplomacy or negotiation. There is only one correct response, and that is utter, complete destruction and total obliteration of the pathogen. In many cases, silver ions are invaluable depending on the threat. In other cases, copper ions may be the best answer. My designs incorporate both. But are there other answers we should be looking for? If so, how do we find them? >That's my five cents worth of thoughts. Again, thank you, Mike for making >this available. I'l looking forward to this new project. Thank you. Your comments are extremely well thought out, and I look forward to working with you in the new SilverCell forum. >Cheers! > >Robert Thanks, Mike M. -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
