Assuming one can choose between GMO'd stuff and the real deal I'd say GMO'd *anything* should be left on the shelf <g>. I seriously doubt anyone knows with any certainty what one is eating or drinking today, GMO'd or otherwise? N.
From: mutt...@isp.com To: kag...@cox.net; silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>blending versus juicing Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:35:20 -0800 I would hope, for your sake, that you would leave all the GMO's at the store. ----- Original Message ----- From: kagi To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 4:13 PM Subject: Re: CS>blending versus juicing Should GMO food be blended, or juiced? Which is better? From: Alan Jones Sent: Friday, 04 January, 2013 16:39 To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: CS>blending versus juicing Apologies if this is too off topic or covered before. Is there any consensus in the blender versus juicing debate, wrt which one (a) damages nutrients less and (b) which results in the most absorb-able output? I read lots of claims both ways but I wonder if there is any real evidence supporting any of the claims? It seems logical to me that both do about the same amount of "damage" to the food, even the expensive juicers like a Norwalk, no? -- Alan Jones "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." (Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution)
<<attachment: wlEmoticon-smile[1].png>>
