The high voltage will impart a higher velocity to the ions being emitted
and the pulse width limit averaged current.
I don't know that that will affect electrode deposits in any way other
than maybe blowing them off into the water or perhaps have those
byproducts form in the water rather than on the electrodes.
Try it and see what happens.
Ode
On 8/2/2014 8:19 PM, John Popelish wrote:
On 08/02/2014 08:01 PM, asifnathekar wrote:
Any advantages over regular DC current controlled
designs Or people who use zappers at 25khz frequencies
such as don croft/ Hulda Clark designs
At this point, any advantages are unproved. I was frustrated with the
silver oxide and electroplated solver particles produced with DC
systems. I am hoping for input about whether or not these effects can
be finessed by using brief, high voltage pulses, separated by relative
long resting periods, that let the atomic oxygen, at the cathode,
disperse and the ejected silver atoms (or clusters) to diffuse away
from the electrodes.
I got the idea from pulse battery charging circuits. I noticed that
they altered the surface texture of the battery plates, relative to
pure DC charging systems.
But, at this point, I make no definite claims about whether this
generator produces anything different than batteries. This is what I
am trying to discover.
I'll try to find info on the Hulda Clark design you mention.
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>
