It's pretty obvious that making colloidal silver is by no means a simple
process as evidenced by the volume of messages on this list.
Our only saving grace is that a really wide range of results "does the job".
Hammers, regardless of size , shape or style of swinging it... drive nails.
{If it won't, maybe it's not a hammer}
Ken
At 10:38 AM 12/26/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Marshall said it well, and is what I had in mind but didn't communicate it
>very well. The Borderlands article is interesting, but is only one data
>point. What is needed are more carefully conducted experiments, as Marshall
>indicates, to determine that the phenomena is repeatable, and isolating the
>variation to just one cause such as lunar position. Until that is done, the
>one experiment is statistically insignificant.
>
>Has anyone generated say 100 batches of CS all at once (same starting and
>ending time), with as close to the same conditions as possible in a
>laboratory, and determined the statistical variance of the batches with each
>other? If we can't generate nearly identical batches given the nearly
>identical conditions (same H2O, volume, electrode purity and wetted area,
>current, temperature, ambient atmosphere, brew time, electromagnetic and
>accoustic environment, (same mental attitude about each batch being
>brewed???), etc.), then we must first understand why there is so
>much variation before we can start introducing other variables such as moon
>gravity or whatever. One would hope and expect that such an uncomplicated
>procedure (e.g. simple electrolysis) could produce highly repeatable
>results. Then one could feel confident in doing experiments to determine
>what outside influences may affect properties of the "brew".
>
>Sadly, the large scale laboratory tests with CS likely will never be done
>because those who could invest the substantial funds required would not be
>able to get a return from their expenditure. We may not now know how to
>make the "best" CS or ionic silver or mix of both yet, and we may never know
>this, but at least we can feel confident that what we do make from pure
>water and silver only has a high probability of improving our quality of
>life. It is reassuring to see the anecdotal evidence of benefits keep
>piling up from more and more people, and none of us are turning blue-gray!
>--Steve
>
>----- Original Message ----- >
>> See www.borderlands.com/archives/arch/lunar.htm
>>
>><SNIP>
>> However although there does seem to be evidence that the moon does have an
>> effect if we can believe that these experiments were really run, and
>resulted
>> in these reported results, additional testing needs to be done to confirm
>it.
>>
>> First it needs to be duplicated by others, and it needs to be done with
>double
>> blind testing. It really needs to be done again by someone who doesn't
>believe
>> in the phenomena, since it is just as likely that the expectations of the
>> experimenter caused the difference as the planets.
>>
>> Marshall
>>
>>
>> --
>> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>>
>> To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
>> silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
>> with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>>
>> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
