Hi Kevin et al, Kevin, its obvious, at least to me, that you haven't read any of the books relating to Schauberger's work on 'living water'. The best example I know is 'Living Energies' by Callum Coats, which I suggested to you some time previously. If you had you would realise that your statement about placing water in a blender to energise it was very opposite-to-correct. I can only reiterate: read the book, or something similar, to get at least a feel for the subject.
Regards, Mike Fuller From: "Kevin Nolan" <ken...@optusnet.com.au> Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:57:37 +1100 To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: CS>Living Water & CS Resent-From: silver-list@eskimo.com Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:58:11 -0800 Candice and Catmagnet: The basic idea at http://www.alivewater.net/ <http://www.alivewater.net/pages/toorder.html> is that water naturally wants to move in "swirls and curls", and running water through straight pipes (anf 90 degree bends) 'deadens' it. Instead of purchasing some expensive pipework that as far as I can see does no more than gently centrifuges the water, why not just place water in a blender and rev it up for a minute or two? If ''swirls and curls" really re-energize as claimed, the blender treatment should be orders of magnitude better and a lot cheaper to boot. Are there any listers who can verify the claims for revitalizing/energizing/restructuring from use of magnets or vortexing? I mean objective, repeatable tests such as reduced surface tension, improved plant growth or the like. Lots of extravagent claims out there, but how much is true? regards, Kevin Nolan
