Even the mudiest of muds still contains a great deal of ions and small particles. What can't get through a membrane just passes on. The body does a really good job of sorting things out. I don't recall the last time I sweated dimes. I guess it affected my memory.
ken At 05:55 AM 9/28/02 +0600, you wrote: >Marshall, >Another common assertion on this list is that large particle CS is 10% >less effective than the small particle variety. Wouldn't this be at odd >with what you are saying? Also, for what it's worth I can asure you of >the effectiveness of the large particle stuff, time and again it has >treated my family's various aches and pains. >Reid > >Marshall said: >I have been trying to get them for 2 days, but all I get is an answering > >machine. Their number is 423-439-6242. > >Anyway, I believe that this doctor has confirmed what many of here have >been >saying about high ppm CS. That is is less effective then normal 5 to 20 >ppm >CS. The normal method of testing CS is to continue diluting it and >testing >until the effectiveness drops off. If you start with 5 to 20 ppm CS, >out tests >indicate that this does not occur until about a 10:1 dilution. IE. it is > >effective down to about .5 or so ppm. > >Now if, as we believe, high ppm CS is not very effective becaue of the >large >particle size, then if you dilute it 2:1 and that is where the >effectiveness >drops off, that says that basically 500 ppm CS is about 1/5 as effective >as 5 >ppm CS. It seems to me he has shot his own product down with that >statement. > >Marshall > > > >-- >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > >Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > >To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > >
