Ole Bob wrote, in part: > For example those that use a pwt to measure conductance and > convert that to > PPM with a factor will have a REALproblem with my latest > work. Normally the > PWT reading is divided by somethine like 1.8 to get a relative PPM. > > MY newest process makes a CS that has a conductance reading > (PWT to most of > you) 12 for a real PPM of 12 !!!! > And in some cases the conductance is less than the actual > measured Ag+ ppm., > and it is all nanometer stuff!!! > > Those that have the Wplot32.exe can request the data plots, > if someone wants > to see and requests Wplot32.exe I will send it as it takes 380 kB. > > 'Ole Bob" and no Bull about it.
I thought the accepted conversion factor was about 1.15 or dividing by about 0.85... you can't very well have less silver in the solution than the ions measured by conductance, as there will always be some unmeasured elemental particles there also, generally in the range of 5%- 20% I am interested that you note that the conductance reading can be less than the actual ionic concentration. What method was used to determine the Ag+ concentration? Ivan -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
