Please note folk, 3.8 g. Is the TOXIC dose, NOT the lethal dose. Dogs (don't remember the weight) were killed with 1 gram of fine metal powder injected. Not intentionally; they were trying to create a blood problem to study. It is in John Hill's book. Who would ever want to get anywhere that, and how could you do it even if 10 times the required dose was administered?
-----Original Message----- From: Trem [mailto:t...@silvergen.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:19 PM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux Hi Jason, As I said earlier....am I missing something. Thanks for pointing out the reason it isn't a no brainer. Remember, I'm just a designer and not a physician. Although if it was an animal I owned, I'd probably try it since the critter would probably be a goner if something wasn't tried. Too bad they don't have any animals with SARS to try it on. That would produce some definitive results just as trying it on a human would. The thing in your post that bothers me is this. Why is distilled water poisonous if is composed of H20 and has no impurities? It would be pure by definition if distilled or deionized wouldn't it? Or is it that a small amount of water is too much for the body to assimilate? I don't think so since it is used in injections all the time. What is a pyrogen? And why would that be in properly distilled water? Of course silver is incredibly potent. That's the reason for using it. But as Jim just pointed out, the lethal dose is 3.8 grams. I'm talking about using tenths or hundredths of milligrams, not grams. Regards, Trem ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Eaton" <ey...@cox.net> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:03 PM Subject: Re: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux > Trem: > > There are quite a few factors you are not accounting for: > > 1. Distilled water injected into the bloodstream can cause shock > leading to > death. The Sol must be titrated properly; it must be prepared > properly. > > 2. A product that is not certified pyrogen free can easily cause > death in someone who is already sick. It is not enough that a sol be > sterile, it cannot have any endotoxin or any substances that may > induce a immune response. > > 3. Silver injected into the bloodstream is incredibly potent. If an > MD does not have the experience in this, hesitation can certainly be > understandable. > > 4. Any of the above, if done by an MD, may easily constitute criminal > malpractice. In the US, such an MD without proper justification could > easily do federal time. > > Best Regards, > > Jason > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Trem" <t...@silvergen.com> > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:17 PM > Subject: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux > > > > Hi Catherine, > > > > I may be missing something here. If so, please excuse me. If > > deionized > or > > distilled water is used in injections and silver is benign, why is > > it not > a > > no brainer to inject properly made CS intravenously as a trial > > protocol? > It > > seems that it would be immediately known to the casual observer if > > the patient was getting any better since silver works so quickly. > > It also > seems > > to me the blood titer would show a decrease in SARS almost > > immediately > which > > would be the definitive answer. If one used a mix of standard CS > > which is > > normally composed of 70-90% ions and the remainder being colloids, > > it > would > > cover the bases of which is effective since both would be > > circulating in > the > > system. It wouldn't matter which did the job of they were to see a > decrease > > in viral load and/or the patient responded favorably. > > > > Mikes idea of using predominantly ionic silver which his process > > seems to > > produce doesn't carry as much weight with me as he seems to think it does. > > An ion is an ion and the ions he produces cannot be any different > > than an > > ion any device produces. The major difference can only be the ratio > > of > ions > > to particles and the size of the particles. If the mix is made > > using a > good > > process, it will always be crystal clear indicating the colloids are > within > > the small range of being colorless. > > > > As Bob Lee once pointed out there are about 1.41252 X 10+18 atoms in > > one teaspoon of CS made to 20+ PPM. I would think it wouldn't take > > too much > in > > an intravenous solution to see some dramatic results. > > > > And let's remember, an IV of distilled water isn't going to do any damage > so > > why wouldn't someone try this just to see if it works? Or as I said > > earlier, is there something I missed. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Trem > > > > > > > > I became involved with this group and actually had the > > > opportunity to > > > present CS to them during a conference call. At that time, my thoughts > > were > > > running along the lines of nebulizing. > > > > > > Since then, they've considered oral (very difficult because most > > patients > > > are too ill to drink) and IV. They are really skeptical about the > latter > > > because I can't produce enough material that speaks of efficacy > > > with > this. > > > > > >> Regards, > > > Catherine > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: > > > http://silverlist.org > > > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > > > > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
