Ha.

"Blood borne Pac men?"

>From what I hear, they are actually working on it, for good and for bad.

JOH

-----Original Message-----
From: Ode Coyote [mailto:coyote...@earthlink.net] 
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 6:28 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux





   Ya got me. I don't have a clue.

  Blood borne Pac men?

Ode

At 03:44 PM 6/21/2003 -0600, you wrote:

>HI Ode,
>
>I guess my assumption that silver would stay in place was very wrong.
>
>I wonder how it is transported and process into an excretable form?
>Blood>Liver>bile?
>
>JOH
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ode Coyote [mailto:coyote...@earthlink.net]
>Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:00 AM
>To: silver-list@eskimo.com
>Subject: RE: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS 
>Redux
>
>
>
>" Dogs excreted approximately 90% of an inhaled dose of metallic silver 
>particles in the feces within 30 days of exposure."  {Phalen and Morrow 
>1973}
>
>   The only way those metallic silver particles could have been 
>excreted via feces from the lungs of the dogs is to pass through the blood
stream.
>   No mention made of particle size...probably finely ground dust.
>
>Ode
>
>
>At 11:03 AM 6/19/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> >Hi Marshall,
> >
> >I agree.  The organs were loaded.  I don't think the report spoke of 
> >vascular occlusion tho, but I have only read a synopsis.
> >
> >A silver colloid will be excreted too, according to our friend and 
> >former list participant Roger Altman's study [with a population of 
> >one, himself]. Metallic silver will probably not be excreted.
> >
> >When you calculate the amount of water you would have to drink to get 
> >a dose of 3.8 grams, with 10 ppm sol,  the water will be toxic before 
> >the silver.
> >
> >Should the need arise I would not hesitate to self-administer via IV 
> >the silver that I make.  How much bacteria can fall in during the 
> >brief time that I pour the DW or before I put the lid on the 
> >generator?  Not
>enough to
> >Herx.   And there will certainly be no live ones there.
> >
> >Got 4 million?  Then you can prove that CS is not pyrogenic and get 
> >it FDA approved.
> >
> >
> >JOH
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@execonn.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:31 AM
> >To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> >Subject: Re: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS 
> >Redux
> >
> >
> >
> >I don't see how injecting fine metal power of any kind has any 
> >relation to the amount of that metal being toxic.  I would think that 
> >metal power would very effectively block up the blood vessels, and 
> >once you block the vessels to the brain or heart death would 
> >certainly follow. Toxcitiy could be totally different for a colloid, 
> >or compound.
> >
> >Marshall
> >
> >James Holmes wrote:
> >
> > > Please note folk,  3.8 g. Is the TOXIC dose, NOT the lethal dose. 
> > > Dogs (don't remember the weight) were killed with 1 gram of fine 
> > > metal powder injected.  Not intentionally; they were trying to 
> > > create a blood problem to study. It is in John Hill's book. Who 
> > > would ever want to get anywhere that, and how could you do it even 
> > > if 10 times the required dose was administered?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Trem [mailto:t...@silvergen.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:19 PM
> > > To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> > > Subject: Re: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for 
> > > SARS Redux
> > >
> > > Hi Jason,
> > >
> > > As I said earlier....am I missing something.  Thanks for pointing 
> > > out the reason it isn't a no brainer.  Remember, I'm just a 
> > > designer and not a physician.  Although if it was an animal I 
> > > owned, I'd probably try it since the critter would probably be a 
> > > goner if something wasn't tried.  Too bad they don't have any 
> > > animals with SARS to try it on. That would produce some definitive 
> > > results just as trying it on a human would.
> > >
> > > The thing in your post that bothers me is this.  Why is distilled 
> > > water poisonous if is composed of H20 and has no impurities?  It 
> > > would be pure by definition if distilled or deionized wouldn't it? 
> > > Or is it that a small amount of water is too much for the body to 
> > > assimilate? I don't think so since it is used in injections all 
> > > the time.
> > >
> > > What is a pyrogen?  And why would that be in properly distilled 
> > > water?
> > >
> > > Of course silver is incredibly potent.  That's the reason for 
> > > using it.  But as Jim just pointed out, the lethal dose is 3.8 
> > > grams.  I'm talking about using tenths or hundredths of 
> > > milligrams, not grams.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Trem
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jason Eaton" <ey...@cox.net>
> > > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:03 PM
> > > Subject: Re: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for 
> > > SARS Redux
> > >
> > > > Trem:
> > > >
> > > > There are quite a few factors you are not accounting for:
> > > >
> > > > 1.  Distilled water injected into the bloodstream can cause 
> > > > shock leading
> > > to
> > > > death.  The Sol must be titrated properly; it must be prepared 
> > > > properly.
> > > >
> > > > 2.  A product that is not certified pyrogen free can easily 
> > > > cause death in someone who is already sick.  It is not enough 
> > > > that a sol be sterile, it cannot have any endotoxin or any 
> > > > substances that may induce a immune response.
> > > >
> > > > 3.  Silver injected into the bloodstream is incredibly potent.  
> > > > If an MD does not have the experience in this, hesitation can 
> > > > certainly be understandable.
> > > >
> > > > 4.  Any of the above, if done by an MD, may easily constitute 
> > > > criminal malpractice.  In the US, such an MD without proper 
> > > > justification could easily do federal time.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Jason
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Trem" <t...@silvergen.com>
> > > > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:17 PM
> > > > Subject: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS 
> > > > Redux
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Catherine,
> > > > >
> > > > > I may be missing something here.  If so, please excuse me.  If 
> > > > > deionized
> > > > or
> > > > > distilled water is used in injections and silver is benign, 
> > > > > why is it
> > > not
> > > > a
> > > > > no brainer to inject properly made CS intravenously as a trial 
> > > > > protocol?
> > > > It
> > > > > seems that it would be immediately known to the casual 
> > > > > observer if the patient was getting any better since silver 
> > > > > works so quickly. It also
> > > > seems
> > > > > to me the blood titer would show a decrease in SARS almost 
> > > > > immediately
> > > > which
> > > > > would be the definitive answer.  If one used a mix of standard 
> > > > > CS which
> > > is
> > > > > normally composed of 70-90% ions and the remainder being 
> > > > > colloids, it
> > > > would
> > > > > cover the bases of which is effective since both would be 
> > > > > circulating in
> > > > the
> > > > > system.  It wouldn't matter which did the job of they were to 
> > > > > see a
> > > > decrease
> > > > > in viral load and/or the patient responded favorably.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mikes idea of using predominantly ionic silver which his 
> > > > > process seems
> > > to
> > > > > produce doesn't carry as much weight with me as he seems to 
> > > > > think it
> > > does.
> > > > > An ion is an ion and the ions he produces cannot be any 
> > > > > different than
> > > an
> > > > > ion any device produces.  The major difference can only be the 
> > > > > ratio of
> > > > ions
> > > > > to particles and the size of the particles.  If the mix is 
> > > > > made using a
> > > > good
> > > > > process, it will always be crystal clear indicating the 
> > > > > colloids are
> > > > within
> > > > > the small range of being colorless.
> > > > >
> > > > > As Bob Lee once pointed out there are about 1.41252 X 10+18 
> > > > > atoms in one teaspoon of CS made to 20+ PPM.  I would think it 
> > > > > wouldn't take too much
> > > > in
> > > > > an intravenous solution to see some dramatic results.
> > > > >
> > > > > And let's remember, an IV of distilled water isn't going to do 
> > > > > any
> > > damage
> > > > so
> > > > > why wouldn't someone try this just to see if it works?  Or as 
> > > > > I said earlier, is there something I missed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Trem
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   I became involved with this group and actually had the 
> > > > > > opportunity
> > > to
> > > > > > present CS to them during a conference call.  At that time, 
> > > > > > my
> > > thoughts
> > > > > were
> > > > > > running along the lines of nebulizing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   Since then, they've considered oral (very difficult 
> > > > > > because most
> > > > > patients
> > > > > > are too ill to drink) and IV.  They are really skeptical 
> > > > > > about the
> > > > latter
> > > > > > because I can't produce enough material that speaks of 
> > > > > > efficacy with
> > > > this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > Catherine
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of 
> > > > > > colloidal
> > > silver.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: 
> > > > > > http://silverlist.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Silver-list archive:
> > > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >