Hi Ode,

The T.E. is in no way connected to ionic silver, only particles.

I have seen reduction in Ag+ over time in a few batches, that affects the uS/cm 
readings of a PWT or anyother conductivity meter.

Silver ions will agglomerate and not form particles.

"Ole Bob"


Ode Coyote wrote:

> I have run across a strange TE anomolie.
>
> It is normal for conductivity to drop as particles form since particles don't 
> contribute to conductivity and they form out of ions over time.
> I had previously thought that these converted ions would all contribute to a 
> stronger TE but here's the thing...
>
> I made several batches using the latest evolution of the Series 2 silverpuppy 
> that metered out at around 22 uS with a PWT when done. [I use thermal 
> convection stirring which does heat the water some]
> After sitting for a week or so, re-metering yielded 12 uS but the TE had not 
> changed significantly from virtually none.
>
> I ran an experiment to document the effects of heat on conductivity where a 
> PWT is concerned. [Result: Over a 30 deg F change from 70 to 100 as worst 
> case high temp, the difference was 2.6 uS. I'm calling it 3 uS..so, that 22 
> uS will be known as 19 uS to account for temperature distortion as worst case]
>
> So, starting at 19 uS dropping to 12 uS and no real change in TE...what 
> happened?
> Is there such a thing as a non conductive "particle" that's too small for 
> visible light to reflect off of?
> Or is the water itself doing something strange that throws the PWT off that 
> heat soak doesn't explain?
>
> Anybody have a clue?
> Ode
>
> At 09:36 AM 11/21/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >>>>
>
>      Hi, Jonathan and Ode!
>
>      Thanks for your input.
>
>      The electrodes remained in the
>      vessel throughout the run. This
>      was done because it was a
>      control experiment for weak-
>      current electrolysis.
>
>      On reflection, I can identify at
>      contamination or extraneous
>      factors, though there are reasons
>      to discount each of them.
>
>      1) The process took place in an
>      environment with large amounts of
>      chalk dust generated every day, i.e.
>      a school. But chalk dust is mostly
>      large particulate. On the other hand,
>      some portion of it is small enough
>      to collect in people's lungs and
>      make them cough.
>
>      2) The process took place in a
>      place illuminated by fluorescent
>      lights. And Svedberg discovered that
>      UV will sinter metallic silver in
>      water into CS. On the other hand,
>      the glass tube in a fluorescent light
>      blocks the large amounts of UV
>      generated inside the tube.
>
>      3)The process took place in a
>      place that received direct sunlight
>      for much of the day. On the other
>      hand, the panes of window glass
>      block out most of the UV in
>      sunlight.
>
>      So it still remains a mystery to me.
>
>      One thing I have learned, though, is
>      a greater respect for the Tyndall Effect.
>      I also wonder why it is not exploited
>      more, especially as a quantitative
>      metric.
>
>      We have sophisticated electronics to
>      measure pH, conductivity, total dissolved
>      solids, temperature, time control and
>      so forth.
>
>      Tyndallometry was put on a quantitative
>      basis in the age of Victorian and
>      Edwardian science, long before the
>      availability of electronics. The light
>      sources back then we heliostats and
>      carbon arc lamps, which are vastly
>      inferior compared to the laser diode
>      pointers affordable by all of us today.
>
>      In fact, there are now green laser
>      diode pointers on the market that
>      might make it possible, when used
>      with a red laser diode, for ordinary
>      people to do Tyndall spectroscopy.
>
>      Do-it-yourself Tyndallometry and
>      Tyndall spectroscopy would give us
>      a handle on particle size distribution
>      and concentrations of particulate
>      surface area. If I am not mistaken,
>      these have important clinical
>      implications. And after all, our
>      primary goal is enhancement of
>      health.
>
>      Well, thank you for your comments.
>      They have already given me a lot
>      of food for thought.
>
>      Best wishes,
>
>      Matthew
>
> <<<<
>
> -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
> Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> List maintainer: Mike Devour