I'd really like to know for sure exactly what form of silver she used.
Not because I care about her nor about her claims of risk from EIS, but
for the sake of accuracy. It is important to be accurate, otherwise as
we refute her claims, we are as bad as she and those who promote her
story with misleading statements that EIS is risky because of what
happended to her.
You can't fight quackery with inaccuracies, mis-statements, and
assumptions. Perhaps it can't be truly fought at all, people will
believe what they want to believe, but I do not want to align myself
with any type of quackery by spreading myths or making wrong statements.
Where I can find out enough to make accurate statements that is what I
prefer to do. If there is no verifiable information as to what exactly
she did use, we can say what IS verifiable, namely that what she used
was NOT EIS/CS. At least I think that much is not arguable?
This is the hard part of truth. If you are not a liar, or don't want to
be a liar, you must restrict yourself to truth as best you can determine
it: quacks and scam artists of every stripe don't have this limitation.
They are free to say anything at all to obtain their desired ends.
sol
oldgl...@bigcountry.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking, Who cares? Either her doctor made a mistake and/or this woman
made a mistake in overdosing. She is still alive and doing well.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.3 - Release Date: 4/25/2005
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
