Hi Onno,
then let's go the second way - implement tiny15. :-) If ADC isn't
implemented yet, this is also to do later. I haven't really a problem
with TLS. So, if we can use it in a tiny15 implementation, then it's ok.
And maybe this is a stepstone to get also the other missed (?) parts.
(but I'm not sure, I haven't compared tiny11/12/15 and at90s1200 of how
similar they are)
cu, Thomas
Am 23.02.2016 um 20:33 schrieb Onno Kortmann:
Hey Thomas,
Am 21.02.2016 um 20:55 schrieb Thomas K:
Hi Onno,
I am not sure whether the tiny15 is still in the current code base - is it?
Isn't in code base. :-) How complete is your implementation?
Not complete. AFAIR the pins/ports and timer worked but the ADC was missing.
Thinking about this, I think I am ok with removing the TLS if it makes your
life easier as it looks
like you are de-facto maintainer(?).
As long as you would be ok with some commits I might make someday(TM) to
implement support for the
Tiny15L (and maybe 90S1200) :-)
Cheers,
Onno
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
