On 29/01/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 4:36 AM, Stathis Papaioannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Are you simply arguing that an embodied AI that can interact with the
> > real world will find it easier to learn and develop, or are you
> > arguing that there is a fundamental reason why an AI can't develop in
> > a purely virtual environment?
>
> I think the answer to the above is obvious, but the more interesting
> question is whether it even makes sense to speak of a "mind"
> independent of some environment of interaction, whether physical or
> virtual.

Could that just mean in the limiting case that one part of a physical
object is a mind with respect to another part?




-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=90839892-81029c

Reply via email to