When I say "test" bridge, I mean the default SBC.  I removed the standard 
sipXbride-1 SBC and just entered a new SBC called "test."  That's it.  Internet 
calling would use this "test" SBC and calling between remote workers WORK just 
fine.  If I use the default sipXbridge-1, the calls between remote workers do 
NOT work.  With the above I just mentioned, I do not even have an ITSP setup in 
the mix yet.

If I use an ITSP like Flowroute as mentioned earlier, I use the default SIP 
Trunk SBC of sipXbridge-1.  All of my remote workers can dial through the ITSP 
and make "normal phone calls, BUT still NOT extension to extension or between 
remote workers by extensions.  for example, I cannot dial extension 1401 - my 
boss even when we are connected at the same time to the sipX server remotely 
(my extension 1402) - it works if I don't use the sipXbridge-1 from standard 
SIP Trunk setup.

I hope you can understand here, if not let me know.  I've tried to explain it 
as closely as what the label says.  Forgive my lack of formal VoIP experience; 
however, I know my FW rules are correct as verified by Michael Pilcher book and 
pfSense blog on it.  5060 and 5080 are open on the WAN that maps to the sipXecs 
server's 5060 and 5080 ports. I've been working on this for 2-3 weeks straight 
now and I've tried many different configurations including on softphones - 
removed eyeBeam and using XLite now (paid to free). 

--- On Sat, 11/21/09, M. Ranganathan <mra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: M. Ranganathan <mra...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipX Bridge
> To: "Jordan Turner" <jordan.turner1...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org, "Tony Graziano" 
> <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
> Date: Saturday, November 21, 2009, 3:23 AM
> Hi!
> 
> 
> I am not sure what a "test bridge" refers to in your mail
> below. I am
> not sure what a "direct extension call" is either. Are you
> attempting
> to do "Internet calling" - i.e. calling directly via a
> softphone using
> a SIP URL? If so you would need to direct that call through
> an ITSP
> account which is known to sipxbridge ( this has changed a
> bit in 4.1.
> In 4.0.4 sipxbridge will only handle calls when it knows
> about the
> account corresponding to the request URI domain part).
> 
> If you are referring to remote workers (i.e. remote phones
> that
> register directly with the sipx Registrar) then note that
> SipXbridge
> runs at port 5080. SipXproxy runs at port 5060. Remote
> phones talk
> directly to the proxy server and register directly with the
> sipx
> registrar. You cannot configure your firewall to port
> forward from
> 5060 on your firewall to port 5080. You need two ports -
> 5060 and 5080
> open on your firewall, each mapped to an identical
> "internal" port. If
> your ITSP is using direct IP address based provisioning, it
> has to
> provisioned to send signaling to port 5080. If it is using
> registratoin, then there is usually not a problem as
> sipxbridge will
> register port 5080.
> 
> Ranga
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Jordan Turner
> <jordan.turner1...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > This sipXecs install is brand new.  We are just
> testing sipXecs out to see if it fits our needs.  ALL users
> are using eyeBeam 1.5.19.x softphones from CounterPath.  We
> are not purchasing any hard phones with this system until we
> see it work with current setup.  The ITSP we are using is
> Flowroute - they give you .25 to trial their service thus it
> is what we are using with sipXecs.  I am not having to
> enter 5060 for Flowroute's service.  The ITSP works fine.
>  What does not work is direct extension calls with outside
> softphones until I remove the default sipXBridge-1 and use a
> test bridge.
> >
> > --- On Sat, 11/21/09, Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
> >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipX Bridge
> >> To: jordan.turner1...@yahoo.com,
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> Date: Saturday, November 21, 2009, 2:37 AM
> >> What phones are the remote workers
> >> using? Are they dialing the itsp did
> >> number or the internal line number? Can you
> provide a call
> >> trace?
> >>
> >> I'm also curious why this is happening with an
> itsp. I am
> >> going to assume
> >> the itsp is not configured for port 5060 also is
> it?
> >> ============================
> >> Tony Graziano, Manager
> >> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> >> Fax: 434.984.8431
> >>
> >> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> >>
> >> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems
> Helpdesk:
> >> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> >> Fax: 434.984.8427
> >>
> >> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> >> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Jordan Turner <jordan.turner1...@yahoo.com>
> >> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>;
> >> Tony
> >> Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
> >> Sent: Fri Nov 20 21:32:16 2009
> >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipX Bridge
> >>
> >> Yes, system informed of the update and
> automatically
> >> installed when I
> >> approved.
> >>
> >> --- On Sat, 11/21/09, Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
> >> > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipX Bridge
> >> > To: jordan.turner1...@yahoo.com,
> >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> > Date: Saturday, November 21, 2009, 2:24 AM
> >> > Have you updated to 4.0.4 yet?
> >> > ============================
> >> > Tony Graziano, Manager
> >> > Telephone: 434.984.8430
> >> > Fax: 434.984.8431
> >> >
> >> > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> >> >
> >> > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems
> Helpdesk:
> >> > Telephone: 434.984.8426
> >> > Fax: 434.984.8427
> >> >
> >> > Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> >> > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> > <sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
> >> > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> > <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
> >> > Sent: Fri Nov 20 21:13:50 2009
> >> > Subject: [sipx-users] sipX Bridge
> >> >
> >> > Do I have to use the default sipxBridge-1 SBC
> that
> >> gets
> >> > created when you
> >> > enable the SIP Trunk role?  This works fine
> when
> >> using
> >> > a SIP Trunk provider,
> >> > but I can not use it properly for  external
> >> clients
> >> > trying to reach each
> >> > other that are outside the Intranet unless I
> delete
> >> the
> >> > default sipXBridge-1
> >> > and create a new one.  When I do that, then
> my
> >> SIP
> >> > Trunk provider does not
> >> > work.
> >> >
> >> > Does everyoine just use this default
> sipXBridge-1 or
> >> are
> >> > you suppose to
> >> > create new SBC?
> >> >
> >> > Can you guys have two ip phones outside the
> company
> >> make
> >> > both extension to
> >> > extension call AND SIP Trunk calls to a
> provider at
> >> same
> >> > time?  I know I
> >> > can't.  Yes, I have gone through the sip
> trunk
> >> guide
> >> > on the wiki.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> _______________________________________________
> >> > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> >> > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> >> > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> M. Ranganathan
> 


      
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to