Matt,

Yeah -- I'd never use less than 1GB.

But here's the thing that I feel might have given you the wrong idea about what I am doing:

        Host    Container
Physical        256     2048
Swap    1792    0


OpenVZ does not give the container any swap space. It can't do that because it's not a hypervisor, you're not giving it dedicated disk.

So, as far as the CentOS container is concerned, it has 2GB of RAM and no swap space.

I do not mind if OpenVZ swaps out most of the unused-yet-mysteriously-allocated-by-java because this is not a high disk-IO application.

FYI: The "host" is a Debian 5 x64 system, the "container" is CentOS 5.2 i386 running sipXecs 4.0.4. You should give OpenVZ a look. I've got many years of VMware ESX experience in very large environments, but OpenVZ is scoring points quickly for me.

-- Robert



Matt White wrote:
I'd be careful running sipx with anything less than 1GB. We have never had success with anything less than 1GB....even with a small 5 user environment. After a while service like voicemail will slow until they don't respond.

Like other have noted, sipx is memory hungry. If your looking for multi-tenant, we have had "fair" success with VMWare ESX and it's ability to memory share between VM's which helps a fair amount.

-M

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to