On 5/18/2010 1:42 PM, Mossman, Paul (Paul) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I understand that you could have a second AutoAttendant dial plan rule. This
> allow you to have second AA Extension, with distinct Default/Working/Holiday
> attendant configuration.
>
> How often are multiple AutoAttendant dial plan rules actually used?
>
> I ask in reference to XX-7822 [1]. I think we can improve the "single"
> default Auto Attendant's ease-of-use, but it might be at the expense of the
> "multiple" Auto Attendant case. (The workflow for adding new Auto Attendant
> Extensions would be less apparent.)
>
> Should I consider this trade-off?
>
>
> -Paul
> paulmoss...@avaya.com
>
>
>
>
>
You can't get rid of this one Paul. Multiple AA's with different
dialing plan's would not be that uncommon. IMO
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/