I would concur. We depend on this functionality. The only way it could work for us is if personal auto attendant support a complex config like the full blown AA.
-----Original Message----- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Alfred Campbell Sent: May-19-10 6:54 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] More than one AA dial plan rule? (XX-7822) On 5/18/2010 1:42 PM, Mossman, Paul (Paul) wrote: > Hi all, > > I understand that you could have a second AutoAttendant dial plan rule. This allow you to have second AA Extension, with distinct Default/Working/Holiday attendant configuration. > > How often are multiple AutoAttendant dial plan rules actually used? > > I ask in reference to XX-7822 [1]. I think we can improve the > "single" default Auto Attendant's ease-of-use, but it might be at the > expense of the "multiple" Auto Attendant case. (The workflow for > adding new Auto Attendant Extensions would be less apparent.) > > Should I consider this trade-off? > > > -Paul > paulmoss...@avaya.com > > > > > You can't get rid of this one Paul. Multiple AA's with different dialing plan's would not be that uncommon. IMO _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
