All phones get there IP's from the DHCP server distributed on the SipXecs
ISO.

Bryan

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> wrote:

> The phone is getting its ip from dhcp (#8)?
> ============================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> <sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
> To: thod...@frontier.com <thod...@frontier.com>; Discussion list for users
> of sipXecs software <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
> Sent: Thu Nov 18 16:33:09 2010
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers
>
> It does make a difference.  Unplugging phone number 8 calls start working
> again.  If we deley one or more phones to ring "if no answer", the calls
> also work.
>
> Bryan
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Todd Hodgen <thod...@frontier.com> wrote:
>
> > Not likely.   IMHO, if you look at your configuration between sipXecs and
> > this carrier, it relies on one configuration between the ITSP and your
> > SBC.
> > That configuration doesn’t change based on the number of phones that you
> > have.
> >
> >
> >
> > If you think plugging in the last phone created the issue, it would be
> > simple enough to unplug it and see if it starts working again.  I suspect
> > it
> > won’t make a difference.  I’d check with your ITSP to see if the
> > resolution
> > they created is still working, as it may have been removed  by the
> > resetting
> > of something, somewhere.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> > sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Bryan Anderson
> > *Sent:* Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:52 PM
> >
> > *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers
> >
> >
> >
> > uhm.... I discovered that not all 8 phones were connected.  After
> plugging
> > in the 8t phone, the calls stopped working from verizon again.  Any
> ideas?
> > Could there be a setting on the phone system?
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Bryan Anderson <branderso...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Okay,
> >
> >
> >
> > NexVortex "looked" into it, and even "opened" a ticket with their
> > underlying carrier.  Both of them said "It is with Verizon".  I opened a
> > ticket with Verizon just for a paper trail and they opened at ticket with
> > Level Three.  NexVortex was not responding with a 200 OK within the 40ms
> > time required.  They have now resolved the issues and calls are going
> > through.  Just thought I would give you all an update.
> >
> >
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Bryan Anderson <branderso...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Ok, so YAY my server is up to date now.  Although still having Verizon
> > wireless issues, and still can't get the instant messenger service to
> stay
> > running, although right now that is not a concern for us.
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Bryan Anderson <branderso...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > @Michael - What do you have for phone service?  nexvortex or some
> > one/thing
> > else?
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Tony Graziano <
> > tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
> >
> > disable role, restart svc, enable role restart svc.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Bryan Anderson <branderso...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Clean All worked.  Now Instant messanger is failing to start.  It
> reports:
> > Standard output
> >
> >    - Starting openfire:
> >    - Starting openfire
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Michael Picher <mpic...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Try a 'yum clean all' before the 'yum update'
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Bryan Anderson <branderso...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > So with the above mentioned URL I got 404 not found, removed the "i386/"
> > at
> > the end and got this:
> >
> > Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
> >   Current   : Thu Sep  2 08:55:07 2010
> >   Downloaded: Thu Aug 26 07:43:26 2010
> > Setting up Update Process
> > No Packages marked for Update
> >
> > >.<
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Bryan Anderson <branderso...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Should I change the Base URL to that?  if so, still no packages. >.<
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:02:38 -0400
> >
> >
> > From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers
> >
> > By golly you might be right.  Try this one:
> >
> >
> >
> > http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_5/i386/
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Bryan Anderson <branderso...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > ok, so this is what i did:
> >
> > 1 ) I renamed the repo under /etc/yum.repos.d to CentOS-Base.repo
> > 2) removed the SipX info at the bottom of that repo
> > 3) wget
> >
> http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipxecs/sipxecs-4.2.0-centos-i386.repo
> > 4)ran "yum update", that updated 242 packages.
> > 5) logged into sipx and didn't see a difference, so I restarted.
> > 6) verifyed everything works.
> >
> > /etc/redhat-release now reads "CentOS release 5.5 (Final)"
> >
> > 7) changed base url to 4.2.1
> > 8) ran "yum update" again and it says "No packages marked for update"
> >
> > Did I do something wrong?
> >
> > Thanks Bryan
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Tony Graziano <
> > tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
> >
> > 2 things need to happen.
> >
> > 1. Rename the repo that is there as
> >
> > CentOS-Base.repo
> >
> > edit it and remove the sipx information at the bottom, that's hurting you
> > right now, and save it.
> >
> > 2. get the 'intermediate" 4.2 repo using
> >
> > cd /etc/yum.repos.d
> > wget
> >
> http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/sipxecs-4.2.0-centos-i386.repo
> >
> > (assuming its a 32 bit install)
> >
> > Then if you do an update (which you should), get a full backup first, and
> > do the update from CLI (yum update).
> >
> > If that goes well, consider making sure everything is ok (that version is
> > buggy with registrations), and you need to change the baseurl from 4.2.0
> > to
> > 4.2.1 in the sipx repo file, save, and update again.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Bryan Anderson <branderso...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > cat /etc/redhat-release = CentOS release 5 (sipXecs 4.0.1)
> >
> > I have performed an update once, using the web interface and it crash a
> > couple of services and i couldn't bring them back up so i reinstalled and
> > left it at that.   The plan was to in a controled environment figure out
> > the
> > update process then update it.  This is the only issue we have had with
> > NexVortex, and I am not sure its them, but haven't ruled that out.  They
> > have been quite helpful.  So far the issues have been something with my
> > configuration.
> >
> > I'm not a Linux noob but not exactly an expert.  I am how ever a noob
> when
> > it comes to VOIP.  Alot of ITSP's we talked to wanted to bring in a T1
> and
> > running the SIP trunk over it.  A T1 is not available nor feasible for
> > that
> > office.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Bryan
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:22:18 -0400
> > From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> >
> >
> > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >
> > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers
> >
> >
> >
> > Separately, you are on an "older" version of sipx.
> >
> > What does:
> >
> > cat /etc/redhat-release
> >
> > output say?
> >
> > It is likely you need a repo change and two inline updates in order to
> get
> > current.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Tony Graziano <
> > tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
> >
> > Firstly. There were many itsp's I have used with sipx (using ingate
> > session
> > border controllers).
> >
> > There were several ITSP's I found too difficult to use at all and
> > nexvortex
> > was one of them.
> >
> > Nice guys, just up the road here, but I had continual issues with them
> and
> > had to pull the plug. That was a couple of years agao and maybe things
> > have
> > changed for them.
> >
> > I recall some upstream issues with certain carriers always being an
> issue.
> > I
> > did lots of traces and pcaps. I just started using itsp's that had better
> > answers for what I needed.
> >
> > http://blog.myitdepartment.net/?p=127
> >
> > Continued...
> > ============================
> > Tony Graziano, Manager
> > Telephone: 434.984.8430
> > Fax: 434.984.8431
> >
> > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> >
> > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> > Telephone: 434.984.8426
> > Fax: 434.984.8427
> >
> > Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> > <sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
> > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
> > Sent: Wed Oct 27 13:50:35 2010
> > Subject: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers
> >
> >
> >
> > I work for a small non profit and we have
> > begun using sipX in an office in Everett,WA.  We have 8, 2 line polycom
> > soundpoint 331 phone.  We use NexVortex as our service provider with 4
> > DID's.
> >
> >
> >
> > Just after moving to this system we noticed some calls would ring once
> > and then disconnect.  We did some testing and discovered it was isolated
> >  to Verizon Wireless callers.  I have yet to figure it out.  I have had 3
> >  T- mobile customers call, 2 AT&T, 1 Sprint, and 5 Verizon.  I have
> > tried 7 land lines.  Aside from those about 20-40 calls a day in and out
> >  of the system work.  Callers that have show as "failed" or "Abandoned"
> > in the CDR when called back say they are Verizon and report the same
> > issue, "It rang once then hung up".
> >
> >
> >
> > Two of the DID's go to hunt groups that simultaneously ring all phones.
> >  If no answer the Hunt group falls to x200 and hits a general mailbox.
> >
> >
> >
> > One number is an Alias that is Assigned to a user, which is the user on
> > line
> > 2 of all 8 phones.
> >
> >
> >
> > The fourth number is really just for me to test with.
> >
> >
> >
> > Yesterday I did some testing on routing the call different ways in our
> > system using one number.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) I sent callers to a hunt group = Verizon callers got disconnected.
> >
> > 2) I sent callers to auto-attendant = Verizon callers got through,
> > entered an extension and calls were answerable by our users. (if no
> > answer it went to voicemail)
> >
> > 3) I sent callers to a user directly = Verizon callers got through to
> that
> > extension. (if no answer it went to voicemail)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So if I send them to a hunt group, the call doesn't work, If I send them
> >  to a user assigned to all the phones, it doesn't go through.  If I send
> >  them to 1 user or to auto attendant, the call goes through.  Any ideas
> > or advice?
> >
> >
> >
> > sipXconfig (4.2.0-018575 2010-04-15T00:40:11 ecs-centos5)
> >
> >
> >
> > I Installed from an ISO.  When I last tried to upgrade various services
> > stopped functioning.
> >
> >
> >
> > Bryan Anderson
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ======================
> > Tony Graziano, Manager
> > Telephone: 434.984.8430
> > sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> > Fax: 434.326.5325
> >
> > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> >
> > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> > Telephone: 434.984.8426
> > sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> >
> > Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> > http://support.myitdepartment.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive:
> > http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ======================
> > Tony Graziano, Manager
> > Telephone: 434.984.8430
> > sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> > Fax: 434.326.5325
> >
> > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> >
> > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> > Telephone: 434.984.8426
> > sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> >
> > Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> > http://support.myitdepartment.net
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Bryan Anderson
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ======================
> > Tony Graziano, Manager
> > Telephone: 434.984.8430
> > sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> > Fax: 434.326.5325
> >
> > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> >
> > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> > Telephone: 434.984.8426
> > sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> >
> > Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> > http://support.myitdepartment.net
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive:
> > http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Bryan Anderson
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary
> > and
> > those who don't.
> >
> > mpic...@gmail.com
> > blog: http://www.sipxecs.info
> > call: sip:mpic...@sipxecs.info <sip%3ampic...@sipxecs.info> <
> sip%3ampic...@sipxecs.info <sip%253ampic...@sipxecs.info>>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Bryan Anderson
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ======================
> > Tony Graziano, Manager
> > Telephone: 434.984.8430
> > sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> > Fax: 434.326.5325
> >
> > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> >
> > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> > Telephone: 434.984.8426
> > sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> >
> > Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> > http://support.myitdepartment.net
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Bryan Anderson
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Bryan Anderson
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Bryan Anderson
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Bryan Anderson
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -Bryan Anderson
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
>


-- 
-Bryan Anderson
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to