They said it should be certified next month. I know I could tell them it was SCS. I told them 'Nortel' SCS didn't even exist anymore. I don't want to be their beta customer though.
On 9/19/2011 1:28 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > except scs is not certified yet either. > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Todd Hodgen<thod...@frontier.com> wrote: >> SO, with TW, nothing would keep you from saying it was an SCS 4.0 install. >> It’s not like they are going to ask to look under the hood, they just want >> to understand the provisioning requirements on their end, and that >> documentation is in your hands for connecting it up. >> >> >> >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin >> (public/usenet) >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:51 AM >> >> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom >> >> >> >> I just spoke with a VoIP sales rep from TW telecom. They do offer SIP >> trunks, but they are currently only certified to work with Cisco Call >> Manager (I'm not really familiar with the Cisco line, I think that is the >> name he used). This guy didn't seem like a true hands on tech guy. He said >> they had 18 other products they were in the process of certifying. The list >> included Nortel SCS 3.0 and Nortel SCS 4.0. No sipXecs. I tried to explain >> the lineage of the various products and that Nortel SCS didn't even exist >> anymore as it was now owned by Avaya. I asked him for contact information as >> to who someone from sipXecs could contact to try and explain a little better >> and possible get it put on their list under the sipXecs name. I'll follow up >> if I get that info. >> >> On 9/6/2011 8:30 AM, Scott Richesson wrote: >> >> FYI: >> >> >> >> I’ve had both TW Telecom and TW Cable out here soliciting me. Despite the >> similar name, they are two completely separate companies. TW Telecom is >> pretty much business only. TW Cable is a residential-grade company that >> also has a foot in the door of business services. >> >> >> >> Scott Richesson >> >> Cincinnati Fan >> >> >> >> From: Philippe Laurent [mailto:p...@ideos.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:25 AM >> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom >> >> >> >> TWBC business phone service and sip = bad idea. >> >> >> >> What they provide, at least in our neck of the woods, is proprietary voip >> that is then converted to analog signaling at the client end, requiring me >> to use a analog to sip converter inside to get it working with sipx. We had >> nothing but a year of issues, with the biggest problem being calls that >> would randomly terminate. >> >> >> >> A switch to voip.ms brought satisfaction to my customer, and I've since >> learned my lesson. >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Max DiOrio<m...@universityent.com> wrote: >> >> I know with Asterisk, Time Warner Business Class Phones were HORRIBLE. Very >> bad echo! I spent months with dozens of people in their support department >> and they kept saying it isn’t them. Another local VoIP installer said that >> they have nothing but trouble with TW. They ONLY hand off their lines as >> analog, forcing you to get an analog gateway. They will not provide a PRI >> or SIP, although they did say that SIP trunking is something they are >> looking into down the road. >> >> >> >> Stay away from Time Warner at all costs with VOIP equipment. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano >> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 2:49 PM >> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >> Subject: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom >> >> >> >> The advantage I see with voip.Ms is that they have automated failover per >> number. At the same time you would need to address firewall needs for each >> site versus the cost for a pri gateway(s). Voip.Ms has a how to for sipx on >> their wiki now. >> On Monday, September 5, 2011, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) >> <mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If I went with a separate ITSP, is voip.ms everyone's favorite provider >>> these days? It would be two 50+ handset locations and many 6 to 10 handset >>> locations. >>> >>> On 9/5/2011 6:01 AM, Michael Picher wrote: >>> >>> The data portion of their solution is typically either a Hybrid Fiber/Coax >>> solution (like most of your cable modems at home) or a Dedicated Fiber >>> solution with some Cisco gear at the customer prem (supports higher >>> bandwidth& more services). >>> Their voice solutions are either analog or PRI type hand-offs from >>> gateways. As of my latest understanding they won't hand you a SIP >>> connection. Most of their sales folks may not even know what SIP is even >>> though that is what is handling the connection to the box they put on site. >>> All they really know it as is VoIP. So, this typically requires that you >>> put in gateways to connect to their gateways... Too bad because of course >>> it is a waste of money and a waste of call fidelity. >>> Also sometimes their signal coming off their gateways can be a little >>> 'hot' and may cause a little echo. It will take a bit to find an engineer >>> who understands what you are trying to tell them but they may eventually fix >>> it. Most of their field techs are cable runners / box swappers. >>> I wouldn't consider them a Tier 1 or 2 provider for business voice. More >>> like a Tier 3. They are OK& relatively inexpensive for the small business >>> space. >>> From a data perspective they seem to be pretty good and certainly higher >>> speed and much less expensive than throwing in T3's and such. >>> Mike >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) >>> <mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Does anyone have any experience with sipXecs and commercial VoIP services >>>> from Time Warner telecom? >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sipx-users mailing list >>>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org<sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> >>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Michael Picher >>> eZuce >>> Director of Technical Services >>> O.978-296-1005 >>> X2015<tel:978-296-1005%20X2015> >>> <tel:978-296-1005<tel:978-296-1005>%20X2015> >>> M.207-956-0262<tel:207-956-0262> <tel:207-956-0262<tel:207-956-0262>> >>> @mpicher<http://twitter.com/mpicher> >>> www.ezuce.com >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> ====================== >> Tony Graziano, Manager >> Telephone: 434.984.8430 >> sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net >> Fax: 434.465.6833 >> >> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net >> >> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: >> Telephone: 434.984.8426 >> sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net >> >> Helpdesk Contract Customers: >> http://support.myitdepartment.net >> >> >> >> Blog: >> >> http://blog.myitdepartment.net >> >> >> >> Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 >> >> >> >> Ask about our Internet faxservices! >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> sipx-users mailing list >> >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
