On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:40:15 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > Then change the subject (i.e., start a new thread) to reflect the different > avenues you are pursuing. You just admitted the "many different directions"
Tony, you're the only one who has decided that this cannot be done. The thread has received input and ideas. There have been others who contributed thoughts trying to come up with ideas and solutions to problems. When things get too personal in threads though, that's pretty much the end of the thread. It started relevant and I can't say that it isn't yet because there may be more input. > to accomplish what you are trying to do, most of which actually do not/may > not even have anything to do with sipx. If you want input from sipx users, > it should be relevant. It's hard for it to be relevant to sift through now > 35 posts and noone is probably all that clear in what you are trying to do. I have said several times what I am trying to accomplish and it was initially a sipx or at least sipx users question It is simply now becoming a bit more obvious that the solution isn't related to sipx. That doesn't mean nobody wants to hear about it because it may be a relevant idea to others as well. In fact, it seems to be something that a lot of people are trying to figure out Anyways... _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
