The ideas of slitaz were good, but now everything it's getting too much
older, including kernel upgrades.

Why doesn't some of you  brings further this project? I made some
packages to add gnome 2 support  but sadly i saw that nobody put them
upstream. Why? on my system i could start gnome 2.32, but my packages were
discarded.

A community project should not rely on a single person; everyone should and
could contribute.

I think that linux users who aren't satisfied with the new gnome-shell and
unity will neither appreciate an old and buggy system like Slitaz.
For me, Slitaz is no more useful

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:05 PM, guilbault frederic <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  I found this funny. Theres no big dilema to me.
>
> Last time i have talk with pankso. it was when tazwok have been replace
> due to the risk for Slitaz of beeing unmaintable if the mains devlopers
> woud gone. Now Pankso seem to be absent and the devlopement/maintining
> compromise ....
>
> what pankso woud do ?
>
> xfred.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:11:20 +0000
> Subject: Where is pankso?
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
>
>
> Where is pankso? I ask this cause we need to move forward and with him not
> even on scm.slitaz.org for like 6 weeks its starting to make me worry
> about him and slitaz. We need to start updating stuff again cause
> everything is so broken that if we stable it will be another joke again.
>
> Chroot needs to be automaticly updated after new packages are build so it
> can stay up to date without much work. This way wok can still be update and
> chroot will update itself after package build. I myself have done alot of
> changes to cookutils in 
> my-cookutils<https://bitbucket.org/godane/my-cookutils>repo. I would like to 
> be able add them in myself but pankso doesn't want me
> touch cookutils cause he thinks i will make it unworkable like tazwok for
> him. So i think we could work it out by simple allowing my just work in a
> testing branch until there is a time you think a merge should be done.
> There is also a new 
> graft<http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html#graft>option in mercurial 
> 2.0 that will allow cherry-picks stuff from my testing
> branch to default branch so it will be easier to merge things that way.
>
> Anyway we need to move froward with or without pankso.
>

Reply via email to