Developement is one side, but security is the other side and for me it is more important in this moment.
Slitaz is a distribution that is used by many people around the world and I definitly would like to know, where the server is now located, who has root access .... I just want to remember you, that Linux Foundation servers were hacked in September..... Christophe, I think it is really time to give some explanation - if you cant on the mailinglist, so do it straight to christopher or pascal. Thomas Am Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:08:09 -0200 schrieb Rodrigo Boechat <[email protected]>: > Maybe you're right. But say something like this through a mailing > list, it's kind of inappropriate. I am enthusiastic about SliTaz. > SliTaz actually revived an old machine of mine. > > I'm not part of the developer team, but I think many people missed > this year with ethics. > Every community needs a leader. If you do not share ideas or their > ideas had not heard properly, took some kind of attitude change that? > Or was saved and stored as a "hurt"? > > I do not know why. I even wish I could use gnome 2 with SliTaz, but a > lot could have happened for you to be left out. But one way or > another, talk something like this, it is also contrary to the meaning > of community. For as I know, the community around the SliTaz not > necessarily have to comply with your ideas. Or do they have? > > Know that I do not want to attack anyone. Just decided to expose my > thoughts. A view looking out of the "black box". > > Rodrigo Boechat > > Em 07-11-2011 20:16, Daniele Guerrieri escreveu: > > The ideas of slitaz were good, but now everything it's getting too > > much older, including kernel upgrades. > > Why doesn't some of you brings further this project? I made some > > packages to add gnome 2 support but sadly i saw that nobody put > > them upstream. Why? on my system i could start gnome 2.32, but my > > packages were discarded. > > A community project should not rely on a single person; everyone > > should and could contribute. > > I think that linux users who aren't satisfied with the new > > gnome-shell and unity will neither appreciate an old and buggy > > system like Slitaz. For me, Slitaz is no more useful > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:05 PM, guilbault frederic > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > wrote: > > > > I found this funny. Theres no big dilema to me. > > > > Last time i have talk with pankso. it was when tazwok have been > > replace due to the risk for Slitaz of beeing unmaintable if the > > mains devlopers woud gone. Now Pankso seem to be absent and the > > devlopement/maintining compromise .... > > > > what pankso woud do ? > > > > xfred. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:11:20 +0000 > > Subject: Where is pankso? > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > Where is pankso? I ask this cause we need to move forward and > > with him not even on scm.slitaz.org <http://scm.slitaz.org> for > > like 6 weeks its starting to make me worry about him and slitaz. We > > need to start updating stuff again cause everything is so broken > > that if we stable it will be another joke again. > > > > Chroot needs to be automaticly updated after new packages are > > build so it can stay up to date without much work. This way wok > > can still be update and chroot will update itself after package > > build. I myself have done alot of changes to cookutils in > > my-cookutils <https://bitbucket.org/godane/my-cookutils> repo. I > > would like to be able add them in myself but pankso doesn't want > > me touch cookutils cause he thinks i will make it unworkable > > like tazwok for him. So i think we could work it out by simple > > allowing my just work in a testing branch until there is a time you > > think a merge should be done. There is also a new graft > > <http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html#graft> option in > > mercurial 2.0 that will allow cherry-picks stuff from my testing > > branch to default branch so it will be easier to merge things > > that way. > > > > Anyway we need to move froward with or without pankso. > > > > --- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
