@GoKhlaYeh, maybe you should speak with Christopher before you start working - he has a new branch with kernel 3.x and a lot of bugfixes to avoid dubble work.
Am Wed, 7 Dec 2011 21:13:13 +0100 schrieb Eric Joseph-Alexandre <[email protected]>: > > Le Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:41:38 +0100, > GoKhlaYeh <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi, > > - Can you give us more detail about what you need to change in tazwok > and receipts ? > > - For me the goal is to prepare release. > Publish cooking, so more users can test and help us to fix. > > > As nobody does, I'm going to answer to my questions myself; in case > > it interest somebody. > > > > > - Is tazwok still compatible with the wok ? > > Not anymore. Incompatibilities are light and easy to solve. But it > > involves changes to packages in the toolchain. Changes are only to > > get back compatibility: it doesn't imply changes in the package > > itself or how it's cooked by cookutils. It should not create any > > problem if I push those fixes. Package will be recook but the > > result will be exactly the same than the previous one. Anyone > > against this ? > > > > > - What's the prefered way to compile full distro ? > > To be honnest I feel like there's currently no way to recook full > > SliTaz easily. Part of the reason is that I don't get how to use > > cooker for that, and wok is not fully compatible with tazwok - which > > itself need some work anyway. I don't think cookutils allows to > > rebuild SliTaz for users, and I don't think it's coded for that > > specific use. > > > > > - What kind of update should be done ? The wok was freezed to > > > prepare the release, but release seems delayed until ??? > > I can't answer to that. And nobody seems able to. I think I'm going > > to update receipts for tazwok compatibility, and eventually for > > security/bug fixes. Nothing more until some choice are made at this > > level. If nobody is against this, of course. > > > > > - What are your tought about our current goal? Prepare release, > > > new update cycle, rolling release or what ? > > I think that SliTaz need a stable release; but it doesn't seems to > > be planned at all. It's like the distro doesn't exists without it's > > leader. > > > > --- > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > --- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
