Hi Kapil, start with the old config and what you should choose is part of your work - ask a search machine, compare with kernel.configs of other distributions
like for ATH_9K_LEGACY_RATECONTROL I would say no http://ubuntu.5.x6.nabble.com/heads-up-ATH9K-RATE-CONTROL-config-change-td5029248.html and choose a new username for the forum Thomas Am Sun, 21 Jul 2013 23:55:23 +0530 schrieb kapil jain <[email protected]>: > Hi Tom, > > I made the changes in scripts to build 3.2.48 using > http://hg.slitaz.org/wok/rev/416fab3c90c0 . With 3.2.48, linux-core.u > patch is not needed any more. However there are couple of new > configurations which needs to be added like > ATH_9K_LEGACY_RATECONTROL. I dont know what values to choose for. > Should I use oldconfig and then just add the new parameters from > http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion?bb_attachments=23106&bbat=1053? > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 1:34 PM, kapil jain <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > I compiled the 3.2.40 using the config file from > > http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion/page/2?bb_attachments=25870&bbat=1152and > > it compiled fine. To compile for 3.2.48, are the scripts checked in > > in wok or do i need to make the changes in scripts like in > > http://hg.slitaz.org/wok/rev/416fab3c90c0 . I am still trying to > > figure out the ways with mercurial commands > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi Arun and Kapil, > >> > >> As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my oppinion for the > >> stability of wok its better to stay with it - so we are at the > >> moment on 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it with this > >> one. > >> > >> > >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml > >> > >> When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well, but I did not get > >> all the other linux packages linke linux-wireless, linux-agp, > >> linux-dialup > >> > >> if you they compile on your system, it would be cool to put them > >> online, so I can do an iso and test with my ide devices... > >> > >> Thomas > >> > >> Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530 > >> schrieb kapil jain <[email protected]>: > >> > >> > I have had the similar results as Arun. > >> > > >> > I second the thought of newer version of kernel if we are anyway > >> > doing a kernel update from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make it a higher > >> > version. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash Jana > >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Guys, > >> > > > >> > > Here's an update - I am past the initial hiccups with setup and > >> > > last night I left the default things to build as they are. I > >> > > can see that the package linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I created. I will > >> > > try with Tom's patch tonight again. > >> > > > >> > > Kapil was also trying the same last night. So I guess he will > >> > > also update the same results. > >> > > > >> > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is around 3.11. Once > >> > > the patch works fine for 3.2.40, I am thinking of moving to > >> > > the latest version with everything. What do you guys say? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > > >> > > Arun > >> > > > >> > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi Arun, > >> > >> > >> > >> can you please see the kernel thread.... > >> > >> > >> > >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion > >> > >> > >> > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main blocker > >> > >> > >> > >> Thomas > >> > >> > >> > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530 > >> > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I started the following thread a month back regarding > >> > >> > Slitaz 5.0: > >> > >> > http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I have got some time now and would like to contribute to the > >> > >> > release of version 5.0. > >> > >> > Can someone please list down the current blockers for > >> > >> > version 5.0 release? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Regards, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Arun > >> > >> > > >> > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > Kapil K. Jain > > http://jainkkapil.wordpress.com > > > > > -- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
