Arun,
you need to add the values for the following variable in
linux-slitaz.config:
CONFIG_SCSI_GENERIC_NCR53C400=y
Goto /home/slitaz/wok/linux/source/linux-3.2.48
copy linux-slitaz.config as .config
run make oldconfig
It will prompt you for certain values
check those values from ubuntu kernel and answer those values
copy this .config to linux-slitaz.config and linux-slitaz.config64 in
/home/slitaz/wok/linux/stuff directory
cook the pkg
This time it may succeed or some new values would be required. In 2nd
scenario you will get similar error with diff value this time.
Open linux-slitaz.config and add the values manually after consulting with
other kernel .config files.
For e.g. for ubuntu precise,
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/configs/precise/i386-config.flavour.genericis
the config file.


On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>wrote:

> I used the config with the fix for IDE. But I think there are other
> changes in the config as well. Attached that as well.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Arun
>
> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Arun Prakash Jana 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> Before that, I think the build with kernel 3.2.48 fails. I can see the
>> following in the log:
>> -------------------------------
>> Console input/output is redirected. Run 'make oldconfig' to update
>> configuration.
>>
>> make[2]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2
>> make: *** No rule to make target `include/config/auto.conf', needed by
>> `include/config/kernel.release'.  Stop.
>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `relocs'.
>> mv: can't rename 'arch/x86/boot/bzImage': No such file or directory
>> -------------------------------
>>
>> Attached the full log.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Arun
>>
>> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Arun,
>>>
>>> 3.2.50 is available
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530
>>> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> > Hi Tom,
>>> >
>>> > OK, I got what you mean.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Arun
>>> >
>>> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Arun,
>>> > >
>>> > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I mean you can try
>>> > > whatever you want, but I think, it will not go into SliTaz 5.0.
>>> > >
>>> > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change from 2.6.36 to
>>> > > 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of troubles - no more 486 support only
>>> > > 686 - there is a long thread about it.
>>> > >
>>> > > But this has to be answered by somebody else...
>>> > >
>>> > > Thomas
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530
>>> > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi Tom,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > A new LTS is available:
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Can we try this one?
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Arun
>>> > > >
>>> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my oppinion for the
>>> > > > > stability of wok its better to stay with it - so we are at the
>>> > > > > moment on 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it with this
>>> > > > > one.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > >
>>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well, but I did not
>>> > > > > get all the other linux packages linke linux-wireless,
>>> > > > > linux-agp, linux-dialup
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would be cool to put them
>>> > > > > online, so I can do an iso and test with my ide devices...
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Thomas
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530
>>> > > > > schrieb kapil jain <[email protected]>:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of kernel if we are
>>> > > > > > anyway doing a kernel update from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make
>>> > > > > > it  a higher version.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash Jana
>>> > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial hiccups with setup
>>> > > > > > > and last night I left the default things to build as they
>>> > > > > > > are. I can see that the package linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I
>>> > > > > > > created. I will try with Tom's patch tonight again.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last night. So I guess he
>>> > > > > > > will also update the same results.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is around 3.11.
>>> > > > > > > Once the patch works fine for 3.2.40, I am thinking of
>>> > > > > > > moving to the latest version with everything. What do you
>>> > > > > > > guys say?
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Regards,
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Arun
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >> Hi Arun,
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread....
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main blocker
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> Thomas
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530
>>> > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <[email protected]>:
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> > Hi,
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month back regarding
>>> > > > > > >> > Slitaz 5.0:
>>> > > > > > >> > http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would like to contribute to
>>> > > > > > >> > the release of version 5.0.
>>> > > > > > >> > Can someone please list down the current blockers for
>>> > > > > > >> > version 5.0 release?
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > Regards,
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > Arun
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> --
>>> > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > --
>>> > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Thanks
Kapil K. Jain
http://jainkkapil.wordpress.com

Reply via email to