On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 04:55:10PM +1000, Andrew Macks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> 
> > If nowbody could send HTML/SCRIPT based mail we would not have to spend
> > hours/days to 
> > 
> >  * update virus infromation files
> >  * update virus software regulary
> >  * make sure that even the least knowledgeable user understands
> > 
> > and spend less money on this and could spend money on research ...
> 
> I think you're putting blame in the wrong place.  HTML is an annoyance.
> Outlook's attachment preview and inbuilt Java support *ARE* problems.

I dont think I do. The <SCRIPT> tag allows a lot of things to happen....
I saw a mail a few days back on a mailing list (cant remember which)
and somebody was explaining the idea of a new virus type using the
<SCRIPT> tag. I tried it and got very worried as most of which
he said worked fine.


So at least id we keep HTML as formatting of mail we should only
have a substandard of it -> WITHOUT the script stuff.

> Whatever you do, idiots are still going to open attachments and run them
> if somebody tells them "It's a pretty program for Christmas".

sad.
See above.


Jobst


-- 
My Dogma got run over by my Karma.

|            __, Jobst Schmalenbach, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Technical Director|
|  _ _.--'-n_/   Barrett Consulting Group P/L & The Meditation Room P/L      |
|-(_)------(_)=  +61 3 9532 7677, POBox 277, Caulfield South, 3162, Australia|
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text

Reply via email to