On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 19:41, Ken Foskey wrote: > On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 19:16, Tony Green wrote: > > > I'd be stunned if that ever happened. Though I do think if there is to > > be a change to the list setup, it should be decided by a vote of the > > financial members. > > Let's cut the BS and really put it to the vote... > > As a financial member I would like to propose a motion for the next > meeting that we vote on the slug mailing list. > > a) Leaving it alone. > b) Moving to a moderated list. > c) Changing it to a members only list. > d) Changing it to a financial members only list. > > Option b) will revert to an a) unless we have at least 3 volunteers for > a guaranteed 12 months. > > > Separate motion: > > Any whingers gainsaying this duly taken vote are automatically warned > and on a repeat offence given a automatic moderation for a period of one > week for each further offence. (second offence is two weeks, third > offence three, etc) > > OK I don't think this one will fly but hopefully just raising it some > will get the hint. > > Just in case I am unable to make the meeting I nominate Tony or Jeff as > my proxy. They seem echo my opinions on this matter.
Seconded. I'm tired of the back and forth. (And for the record, I support option a). Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
