<quote who="Ken Foskey"> > On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 19:52, Robert Collins wrote: > > Right. Formally: > > > > I intend to speak pro option a) at the meeting. I propose that we amend > > the motion, such that if there is no "pro-option X" speaker for each of > > the options, those options without a speaker are removed from the list. > > > > Will someone second this amendment? > > Seems only fair. Seconded. >
Accepted. We'll have the vote at the October meeting. Anyone interested in speaking at the meeting on behalf of one of the 4 options, please let us know. Note that option B requires 3 volunteers to moderate the list for at least 12 months, or the list will revert to option A. The motion as it stands is: Vote to modify the mailing list policy to one of: a) Leaving it alone. b) Moving to a moderated list. c) Changing it to a members only list. d) Changing it to a financial members only list. Unless there is a speaker willing to address the meeting on behalf of an option, it will be removed from the list before the vote. Regards, Jan. -- Jan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." - Unknown -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
