No, I haven't changed the switch yet, but again I go back to my main point
here, which is - if it is something in our system design or installation,
why is my Trango backhaul working perfectly on the same switch, same UPS,
same everything?  Just because I don't use a high end managed switch doesn't
automatically mean that the problems are coming from the D-Link.

Gloria

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB


> Have you tried replacing the switch by chance with a different brand?
> I think you said D Link, not the stuff you build backbones on.
> George
>
>
> Gloria Vester wrote:
>
> >Can you tell me where to find the list of MAC addresses that are being
> >recalled?  I am working on my RMAs now and I have a feeling that all five
of
> >the units I have are from the same batch.  When I asked them how many of
my
> >units to RMA, they said it was up to me and my "comfort level".  I don't
> >want to bash SB either - it is counter productive, and they are being
very
> >supportive in trying to help.  But at the same time, I agree with you
that
> >it would have been more cost effective to have just recalled and replaced
> >all the units that were suspect and saved themselves a lot of bad
publicity
> >and us a lot of lost revenue.
> >
> >I have had it pointed out to me from several different sources on this
list
> >that the problem is more than likely not with the airPoints, that is
> >probably a power issue or an environmental issue.  I am not ruling that
out
> >completely, and am continuing to investigate all possibilities.  But if
it
> >were something that we did wrong in our design and installation, why is
my
> >Trango backhaul working perfectly using the same power source, the same
> >cabling, the same switch, in the same temperature environment?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Gloria
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "The Wirefree Network" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 1:47 PM
> >Subject: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>I am feeling a bit guilty for hammering sB so badly...but it is there
> >>fault after all.  They could have resolved this a long time ago.
> >>
> >>Here is the explanation as given to me from them (simplified version):
> >>In June there were 2 production lines putting together sB equipment.
> >>One with bad chips, one with good chips.  My use of "bad chips" is my
> >>own.  They call it "timing issue" chips.
> >>
> >>Prior to getting stamped with MAC addresses, the units are brought back
> >>together on one line and stamped.  Therefore, there is NO way to say
> >>exactly which units have the "bad chips".
> >>
> >>This is why sB is not recalling the entire series of MAC
> >>addresses...there are a bunch of good ones mixed in there as well.
> >>
> >>You may be thinking the same thing I am right now....hmmmm....why
> >>wouldn't they just go ahead and recall the whole batch??  Hindsight,
> >>they would probably have saved a lot of money in lost revenue from the
> >>bad publicity.  And it would have MOST definitely saved us a TON of
> >>money, and therefore retained their good reputation from us.
> >>
> >>Bottomline:  They are doing direct RMA's for all the bad June/July
> >>units.  Just talk to them.  We are all bitching for good reason...but
> >>just do the RMA.  It is all we can do.  Then hope they are really
> >>sending us good stuff this time.
> >>
> >>Sully
> >>
> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> >>
> >>
> >smartBridges <yournickname>
> >
> >
> >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> >>
> >>
> >smartBridges)
> >
> >
> >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
> >
>
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to