I'm not sure - I will check the manual for that device and see if it can be
set, but I doubt it.  Most switches on the market today are auto sensing so
that they can handle whatever different devices are plugged into them.  I am
not saying that is definitely not a problem, but this particular airPoint
did exhibit problems right out of the box hooked directly to a computer, so
I don't think the switch is the issue here.  I will check into it however
and let you know.

Thanks,
Gloria

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nish Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Auto-polling to keep units associated


> Is it possible to force the setting to 10BT? Some times the Auto sensing
> ports tend to jump around and would exhibit similar symptoms.
>
> Nish
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gloria Vester
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:19 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Auto-polling to keep units associated
>
> It is auto sensing - 10 / 100 so that shouldn't be a problem.  The unit
> we
> are having the most trouble with, i.e., it goes down most often, was
> flaky
> when we received it.  Even here in our NOC, right out of the box, it had
> to
> be reset several times to get the Ethernet port to come up.  If there is
> anything else you would like to know or anything else I should try just
> let
> me know.  I appreciate all your help and your responsiveness to this
> situation.
>
> Thanks,
> Gloria
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nish Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:14 AM
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Auto-polling to keep units associated
>
>
> > What settings do you have on the Ethernet ports of your D-Link switch?
> I
> > am wondering if this is due to the speed mismatch. aPPO needs 10BT.
> >
> > Nish
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gloria Vester
> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:59 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Auto-polling to keep units associated
> >
> > In case this might help someone who is having the problem with the
> > Ethernet
> > side dying:  I left NMS running all night with logging enabled hoping
> to
> > keep my units alive.  I lost contact with one of them a few minutes
> ago
> > (the
> > one we had to reset 8 times yesterday to get it back up).  I started
> > pinging
> > the hell out of it the second NMS said it was down and I now have
> > re-established contact with it.  I don't know for how long.  But if I
> > have
> > to leave the constant ping running until I get my replacement units,
> > then I
> > will.  Has anyone else tried this?
> >
> > Hope this might help someone,
> > Gloria
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "sB Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:54 AM
> > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Auto-polling to keep units associated
> >
> >
> > > Our aim is do some polling to keep the unit "alive" at all times as
> > some
> > > claim this will help. So it is interesting to know if this indeed
> > helps.
> > >
> > > Alex
> > > sB Tech Support
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
> Cartwright
> > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:06 AM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Auto-polling to keep units associated
> > >
> > > Alex,
> > >
> > > OK I have set the logging on SimpleNMS (didn't realise it did
> this!).
> > > However, on looking at at the file being created (Stat_log) it only
> > > seems to
> > > collect basic information and not the detailed stuff that
> > SimpleMonitor
> > > stores.
> > >
> > > Be interesting to see if this keeps the units associated.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > Loop Scorpio Ltd
> > > providers of Ledbury Broadband and Highnam Broadband
> > > www.ledburybroadband.co.uk
> > > www.highnambroadband.co.uk
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sB Tech Support
> > > Sent: 24 August 2003 18:43
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Auto-polling to keep units associated
> > >
> > >
> > > You could use simpleNMS that has the ability to log the statistics
> > > (Ethernet & Wireless) or build MRTG to poll the statistics.
> > >
> > > When you click "select from available access point", it may not find
> > one
> > > and you just click the refresh button and you should be able to see
> > it.
> > > It perform exactly the same.
> > >
> > > Alex
> > > sB Tech Support
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
> Cartwright
> > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:13 AM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: [smartBridges] Auto-polling to keep units associated
> > >
> > > Nish,
> > >
> > > One of our "problem" units (a new AirBridge Total) that kept
> regularly
> > > losing association has been good as gold this past week, ever since
> I
> > > started leaving SimpleMonitor running on a remote computer with link
> > > status
> > > logging for that unit.  I read another post a day or so ago from
> > someone
> > > who
> > > seemed to do something similar to "teach" his units to behave
> > > themselves!
> > > Could it be that this might be the lead everyone is looking for into
> > the
> > > "losing association" issue?  If doing something like this keeps the
> > > units
> > > associated, then I can only assume it is keeping the firmware away
> > from
> > > a
> > > "bad" bit of code.
> > >
> > > Is there something that SmartBridges could knock up that would allow
> > us
> > > to
> > > gather link status logging information for multiple units (using the
> > > exact
> > > same method as SimpleMonitor does now)?  If this works, it could
> > provide
> > > us
> > > all with an effective workaround until the exact issue is resolved.
> > >
> > > Another thought...
> > >
> > > I have been finding that I can (contrary to my initial thinking)
> often
> > > re-associate manually by using the Site Survey tab of SimpleMonitor
> > > (only
> > > works if I happen to be at a customer site when it is down of
> course).
> > > However, I generally have to hit the "refresh" button twice before
> the
> > > available APs show up.  Is this significant, I wonder.
> > >
> > > How does the firmware code differ when searching for available APs
> > when
> > > it
> > > loses association versus via the Site Survey "refresh" tool?
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > Loop Scorpio Ltd
> > > providers of Ledbury Broadband and Highnam Broadband
> > > www.ledburybroadband.co.uk
> > > www.highnambroadband.co.uk
> > >
> > >
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > > smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > >
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > > smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > >
> > >
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > > smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > >
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
> >
>
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to