Not really. The detective said that the victim stated that he stopped when
she made her intentions clear. That's not speculation, it's part of the
court record. If he stopped, then he didn't rape her.
my question is if this is all there is too it why do they think they had more then enough evidence to take this to trial. there has to be more then this
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
