|
Honestly I don't know how you could
hear what the *prosecution* said she admitted and say she was the only one
slandered. I beg to differ....
And yeah if the seamen belongs
to someone other than him, which they have already proved it does...if they
don't allow it he most definitely would be being railroaded. Having sex
with someone other than his wife, has absolutely *nothing* whatsoever to do with
it...
oh come on railroad? you act like hes this little saint that has been wronged by the system. number one he admitted to sex with someone other then his wife. number two the only one thats been slandered so far is her. your making this basis over half of the information and the media circus put on by the defense team. now im not saying hes guilty but i am saying you cant hear part of the story and say oh poor poor adulterer boy. now i happen to know of a real life situation where a girl got raped but because of lack of evidence the prosecutor wouldnt even take the case. so there has to be some evidence pointing to him and the prosecution is not gonna be stupid enough to put it all out at a pretraial hearing.' you guys jumped all over me awhile back about hearing ALL the evidence before i should say anything about him being a rapist dont she deserve the same courtesy?
________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net |
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
