|
Sure wouldn't make sense for him to,
that's for sure....
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:46
AM
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Breaking...
It could be political on the prosecutor,
it could be ineptness (remember the prosecutor in OJ's case?), it could be
they hoped it wouldn't come out...I dunno.
But at the same time I sure can't see why
the detective would want to sabotage his own case by lying on the
stand.
Charles
Mims
In a message dated 10/16/2003 11:00:02 AM Eastern
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not really. The detective
said that the victim stated that he stopped when
she made her intentions
clear. That's not speculation, it's part of the
court record.
If he stopped, then he didn't rape her.
my question is if this is all there is too it why do
they think they had more then enough evidence to take this to trial. there has
to be more then this
________________________________
Changes to your subscription
(unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
|
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
