Jackie it was the prosecution's witness, the detective
on the case, that is making these damaging statements to her case. Not the
defense. He's reporting on the initial interview. In that hearing if
she was slandered it was the folks on *HER* side doing it. Is that
possible? Maybe.
Until yesterday I had decided he was guilty. We
haven't even heard the defense's case yet. All we have heard is the
prosecution's case. And the prosecution's case makes her look to be not
credible.
And yes, if he is innocent and didn't rape her then he
has been wrong by the system. There is a vast gulf between rape and
adultery as far as what his consequences should be in the legal
system.
Charles Mims
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
oh come on railroad? you act like hes this little saint that has been wronged by the system. number one he admitted to sex with someone other then his wife. number two the only one thats been slandered so far is her. your making this basis over half of the information and the media circus put on by the defense team.
now im not saying hes guilty but i am saying you cant hear part of the story and say oh poor poor adulterer boy.
now i happen to know of a real life situation where a girl got raped but because of lack of evidence the prosecutor wouldnt even take the case. so there has to be some evidence pointing to him and the prosecution is not gonna be stupid enough to put it all out at a pretraial hearing.'
you guys jumped all over me awhile back about hearing ALL the evidence before i should say anything about him being a rapist dont she deserve the same courtesy?
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
