Very valid point...... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'The Sandbox Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:23 AM Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Right to Die
> > I can see that. Everyone's side needs to be looked at by the family. > > But look at my family. My mother cut off contact with us 8 years ago. She > only sees us at family funerals, and then only to tell me what a horrid son > I am for keeping her grandchildren from her. (Keep in mind *SHE* is the one > that refuses to keep in touch) Would it be right for her to have a say in > my health care in the event of some accident? > > I'd rather my *in-laws* have a say than her. > > Charles Mims > http://www.the-sandbox.org > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Tim Harder > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:12 AM > To: The Sandbox Discussion List > Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Right to Die > > > > Again.... I am not arguing... only pointing out that the parents should have > a valid bitch. If I were the husband I wouldn't be able to say to the > parents.... " No.... she has to die" > If there were a living will that said she wanted to die under theses > circumstances it might be different. > o/sndbox_sandboxmail.net > > > > ________________________________ > > Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net