Very valid point......

----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Sandbox Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Right to Die


>
> I can see that.  Everyone's side needs to be looked at by the family.
>
> But look at my family.  My mother cut off contact with us 8 years ago.
She
> only sees us at family funerals, and then only to tell me what a horrid
son
> I am for keeping her grandchildren from her.  (Keep in mind *SHE* is the
one
> that refuses to keep in touch)  Would it be right for her to have a say in
> my health care in the event of some accident?
>
> I'd rather my *in-laws* have a say than her.
>
> Charles Mims
> http://www.the-sandbox.org
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Tim Harder
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:12 AM
> To: The Sandbox Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Right to Die
>
>
>
> Again.... I am not arguing... only pointing out that the parents should
have
> a valid bitch.  If I were the husband I wouldn't be able to say to the
> parents.... " No.... she has to die"
> If there were a living will that said she wanted to die under theses
> circumstances it might be different.
>  o/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going
to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net


________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to