In a message dated 11/6/2003 2:41:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

And our point is that if the child is doing something you know to be dangerous punishment will teach him not to do that anymore.  If he's jumping a dirt hill that is right next to a busy road, then that is inherently more dangerous than doing the same thing in a vacant lot.  So sometimes even if it is an accident some sort of consequences are necessary.
 
Going back to the broken window...I *accidentally* broke a window.  I was punished for that.  It was right for me to be punished for that because I was doing something I shouldn't be doing.
 
To be sure the punishment must fit the offense, but to say in a blanket fashion that no punishment is necessary when something is an accident doesn't make a lick of sense in my opinion.  Even accidents carry consequences.


and my point is this wasnt a teenager this was a second grader. the parents knew where he was and what he was doing  if they didnt then i dont think much of em leaving a child that young unsupervised by a busy road. either way its not the childs fault that he was playing and accidentily landed in the road. 
________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to