RE: [RCSE] LSF Discussion

[Bob Johnson]

At no point in my post did I suggest or imply that the current LSF Level 1 be replaced; I merely asked if the list of tasks posted was perceived to be as difficult as the current LSF Level 1.   I never have nor will I ever suggest or propose the replacement and/or modification of the current LSF Level 1 or any other part of the current LSF program.   Regards, Bob Johnson   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; soaring@airage.com Subject: Re: [RCSE] LSF Discussion   In a message dated 9/13/2006 1:39:07 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Would you perceive the following to be a set of tasks that is at least as difficult as LSF Level 1? Whyinhell do we NEED a replacement for Level I?! - did you mean Level II?  If so, the short answer is NO, on the basis of landing requirements, if nothing else.  Good Lift!