Good question. Lots of answers.
I'm flying the same sailplane I've been flying for the last 10 years.
(Usually followed by good, go to 2.4. Less chance of a conflict for me).
I have 25 sailplanes. How many RX do I need to replace?
I'm waiting for them to work out all the problems. (Windows 95 user)
I like that big antenna sticking up there. (don't go there)
Those transmitters have digital trims (user of the cheapest servos out
there that never center anyway)
There is nothing better than my Ace....
I love my stylus (he probably needs the extra excersize from the heavy
TX anyway)
I just bought a 9303. (and I need to scrape together all the $ I can for
a new sailplane cause this one isn't going to last that long)
I like fishing my antenna down the carbon fuse and adding a tail out the
end.
============
Guy with red shirt , oh, he was flying 2.4 all of last year at every
event. They don't count.
Guy with orange on his shirt, that is mostly grey. Oh, that's the red
shirt guy...
Didn't the red shirt guy ask this question last year. Check the
archives... ;-)
He can't be all that bad, after all he flies sailplanes.
Practice is more important than playing with some new electronics toys.
See you in the landing circle.
I can't stand hearing gordy calling it gigglehurts. (Hey, where is his
reply)
Darwin Barrie wrote:
I thought 2.4 was all the rage. People abandoning 72 and ham band en
masse to use 2.4 and selling everything off. So, why are we not
seeing it as much in the sailplane world?
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
