All this talk about frequency checkers has me thinking once again about
channel interference.  To be clear, I'm talking about glitches due to
multiple transmitters on the same frequency.

First of all, I think the new low-end Hobbico scanner is a great idea.  I
use Brian Wolfe's RC Scan 7200 every time I fly.  Hats off to Hobbico for
bringing at least rudimentary channel scanning down to a price point
everyone can afford.  I hope it has the effect of bringing a greater
awareness to people about the importance of avoiding channel conflicts.
That awareness is sorely needed.  To wit: We have a couple of electric guys
that show up at our field and never check out a frequency because "I never
see anybody using my channel..."  They've been told several times and still
don't seem to get it.  One of them even works for a major US aircraft
manufacturer and should know better!  :-()  A couple weeks ago, one of them
was flying a foamy 3d plane around right over our landing tapes!  I'm scared
to death of these guys.

Anyway, it seems to me that one way to avoid these channel conflicts would
be to start using HAM band.  At least, they don't sell this stuff in the
local toy stores...I mean hobby shops...and it's probably a fair assumption
that guys on the HAM bands are going to be strict about managing conflict.

I have JR transmitters and JR PCM receivers (R649s and R770s).  Assuming I
have at least an amateur radio technician's license, how do I go about
getting my JR stuff on 50mHz?  

Cheers - Jim Laurel

P.S., Link for RC Scan 7200.  Costs more than the Hobbico, but worth it.
Specs say that it will detect signals up to around 2000 feet away, but in my
experience, that is conservative.
http://www.desert-wolfe.com/rcscan/7200.htm


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format

Reply via email to